.
Content which we will discuss in this short article is "Who is he sees the Buddhist law, one that he sees the Buddhist law." Actually, this topic is not the author himself put that capital is the Buddha's teaching, which is found in many places Agamas or Nikaya.
Buddha said Cause these words the Venerable Vakkali at home because potters, are being serious illness, dying, but the heart is like face to face with the face of the Buddha and bowed before his eyes the last time he dies, but it is impossible to arrive at the Exalted, so has the market venerable Vakkali authors to invite the Buddha to where Minho. Because compassion introspection Buddha personally went to visit Vakkali Bhikkhu. After khiden Buddha asked:
-This Vakkali, if he had nothing to blame on the rule, so nothing hesitant or regretful?
-have long bhante, I want to to see the Blessed One, but the body is not strong enough to get to see the Blessed ..
-Well just then, this Vakkali, nothing is changing with the stinking body. This Vakkali. Who found legal, he sees me, who has seen me, he sees the law. [1].
Trenday is the dialogue between the Blessed and Vakkali. Through this dialogue form, it suggests we understand some basic issues in teaching. The problem that we need to first determine where it is. Bhikkhu Buddha and vitri Vakkali two different stands. Vakkali Bhikkhu stand from the perspective of emotion, with reverence, bowed and eyes to see the face of Buddha last time before leave bare eyes. However, no standing Buddha from the perspective of this sentiment, comfort Vakkali.
Conversely He stood from the perspective of a master who last visited Vakkali Vakkali and education to realize the truth and enlightenment liberation, so he was saying, 'have nothing to show for the stinking body. "
In my opinion this word has two meanings. The first meaning he wanted to transmit to us, He is human like many other people, so thecua His body is like many other bodies, are also needed ngunghi eating, also state sickness or disability status and excretion. The substance is excreted in breath smell like everyone else. There should not be naive to think that Buddha is no longer the phenomenon.
If we had said that the Buddha and other beings, the difference that is just the difference between perception, ie the difference between the enlightened (Buddha) and unenlightened. He has no more enlightened kind of psychological suffering, but suffering in terms of natural kinds remains, such as hot and cold, sick hoan.vv..
In the unenlightened, have both kinds of animals suffering natural physical and psychological. In fact the largest known human suffering is suffering psychological, not physical. Thuhai, he'd say, Vakkali who live too heavy on emotion, too much focus on the external form of the Tathagata, do not see the real value from within that you have found to be under the tree roots problem. The moral value of truth TheTon is not a good 32 or 80 general beauty. Then the body Vakkali to the general comments of the Blessed to do? To what relief for severe illness which he suffered? There is help for imminent death KEMA access Vakkali face?
Before this suffering, only that the Blessed One was teaching new evidence may also terminate or at least alleviate the suffering of Vakkali, the legal that this truth should Vakkali see face to face before his death, if not ordained to live their life in vain, not more favorable to his case what is to benefit beings.
Thethi witness the truth he is under What is the Bodhi tree? That is the theory of origin (pratiya-samutpada), the principle of operation of the human and the universe, on thegian not have an object, a person survive or disappear without this principle. This means that the Buddha is presented in "The Journal A function" with the following contents:
"France interdependence not made by me, not because someone else made. Although Tathagata arise or do not appear in the world, this law still exists. Tugiac Tathagata realized this, the primary sensory level ... "[2]
The doctrine that Buddha enlightened under the Bodhi tree which is dependent origination is the principle of dependent origination operation of life, not by the Buddha their own creation that it is the principle of operation of the human and the universe, not something someone outside the operation of this rule, so called doctrine of dependent origination is the truth. Of Truth in Buddhism is meant as such, is not the word is ambiguous, lack of facilities.
Based from this doctrine of dependent origination, the Buddha pointed out that human nature is not something called the self ( atmam) or soul, these things always in a state of shift change, a shift that Buddha called impermanence (anitya), without any legal standing fixed. Beauty, wealth, status .... Although we have tried to keep to where it is subject to change at a time naodo. The difference between the wise and foolish is the perception right or wrong, that is our attitude about how this situation.
Wise and certainly not forced to do something contrary to law, suvat very often so when shifting, so that people do not mind living with depression or anxiety hostility, only fools want to start new things on his own stand. Want without being born causes suffering.
Because damnation loving beings in suffering, the Buddha according to radical and different levels of each being, used every means that different beings chicho This truth, so they are enlightenment and liberation that formed the sect, sub-division is Great.
From this point it suggests we understand, the French dependent origination, impermanence, selflessness is the truth, the means or the different forms of education, it is not true, because it only has value, and in accordance with a specific object and certain, the truth can not be common to all people and different societies, so do not be called truth.
Here I want people to notice one thing that admiration is very good and very necessary, but we should not confuse our threshold This means grave understanding of Buddhism. Stemming from that cult admiration, so we speak indiscriminately, sometimes damage to the Dharma.
For example, we often say that Buddhism is the truth, while we introduce a some views on Buddhism, it's totally worthless contact with human life, sometimes it is harmful to life. While the Buddha noluc introduced, making people see clearly the truth to be enlightened and liberated the contrary, we do recommend to people with social quandiem obscure, dark, lack of facilities, lack of scientific light.
Thethi how the views that the truth be known? Maybe that is true and reasonable for a certain element in society, but not all, so can not be called truth. That is why the Buddha did not understand that our news is we destroy our butts. Activities of the mind and heart are two different areas, both necessary for human life, but can not replace each other thecho.
heart that instead of thinking of the brain, then life will appear how sulon disorder and confusion; the brain that replace the heart's work, human life was like living a court, so we should not confuse the minds and hearts. In my opinion, should live together with the heart and should work with the mind.
Through the presentation of it helps us explain question: Who the law, he sees me, who has seen me, he sees the law. Here we show the concept of the Buddha, so this sentence be construed as legal who has seen, he sees the Buddha; who see the Buddha, he sees the law. France here only for the teaching of dependent origination. Anyone who has seen the law of dependent origination, he also saw impermanence, egolessness of things and even myself.
Aida see impermanent self then he can not approve: "This is my I my self ", as such, be enlightened and liberated. Here, the concept of enlightenment and liberation are conceptual description of the results and said that, since in Buddhism is common wisdom is the result of the practice of the Buddha under the Bodhi tree . Enlightenment has made himself free from all suffering the obligation, so called liberation. Anyone nhuNgai enlightenment will also have the freedom as he is not high not low.
Contemporary also had many people of many different class to practice his teachings, was also enlightened liberation. After living in his teachings, enlightenment liberation, they feel that, the difference between the way the practice of Buddhism and the traditional religions of India so far. Buddha then advised people "to Buddhism to see and know, solve suffering, not detin" while other religious beliefs very seriously mantra and prayer.
That is why there are many after hearing the Buddha who said the four measures, said:
"It's rather wonderful, Master Gotama! Master Gotama, as upright what was thrown fell down, exposing what was covered, directions to those who lost, or bring light into the darkness to those who have eyes can see colors. Also, Dharma Master Gotama has used various means of presentation, explanation. "[3]
Nhuvay, highlights of the Sakyamuni Buddha is enlightenment liberation, not the 32 general good 80 beauty and principles to become enlightened being freed is the law of dependent origination is impermanent self. So, who wants to see the Buddha, he must find the solution. Also, who has seen the law of impermanence selfless interdependence also means that he has found Buddhism, because Buddhist concept with the concept of law only to see the truth and the truth.
Nhuvay, if you want the bhikkhus Vakkali Buddha reviews should be face to face with the enlightenment and liberation, as if to pay tribute Vakkali Buddha then Vakkali should practice his teachings, if Vakkali want to rid yourself of the suffering Vakkali own theory of origin must be enlightened impermanence and selflessness., even if Vakkali want the goods of being first enlightened to the truth Vakkali. It is the content and meaning phrase: "Who the law, he sees the Buddha; who has seen the Buddha, he sees the law" when he advised bhikkhus Vakkali sick time.
Still, this is the teaching of the Blessed One for Exchange Vakkali parade in the past. I believe, the content and meaning of it still has practical value for today's Buddhism. Are we trying to fill yellow painted good minister praised cuaduc 32 Buddhist, but we accidentally or deliberately forget that his teachings have enlightened?
reverence Should we use all the praise, introducing the system super Vietnamese Buddhist philosophy, but we forget that the young generation today is the generation that is mature in progressive social science techniques, and are trained in the system advanced education, have higher dochuyen subjects, they will be difficult to accept these views obscure the lack of scientific basis. While the majority of people in society today, interested in issues related to human and social existence that they are, not the issues of a metaphysical philosophy.
I believe that the teachings of the Buddha is enlightened teachings to people, objects maduc Buddhist education is human. Though the teaching system that addresses solve specific problems in the past, sometimes no longer suitable for human and society today, but through other forms of education, it still contained an mental principles of education that he wanted to send to the next generation is not the same social and territorial. That principle, that spirit is the absolute value, applicable to all times and people.END=VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY THICH CHAN TANH.( SRAMANERIKA,NOVICE-NUN ).VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUNS.( GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY ).4/8/2012.NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).
No comments:
Post a Comment