CHAPTER 3.ETHICS AND LAW ABOUT BUDDHISM.

 

The remedy of this world,
and to no diversity,
But there is a remedy which can be compared with the Dharma.
So these monks, bowls of medication to take.
drink bowl Religion France,
will no longer age, will pass to the other side of death,
and will arouse and to see the truth, O
monks, there is help for all thirsty,
and will be freed from the thirst.
German Buddha

Buddhism encourages ethical or not,

and if so, the principle of morality is it?

On this question may seem simple but in fact, extremely complicated. So first of all, as we are moral?

For the philosophical basis of Western metaphysics as well as for the religion based on the Bible, morality is the standard parts in the supernatural nature, such as evil or good by the God regulations or imposed by reason.

Buddhism does not advocate a concept like that.

In fact it can be said that is helping us to behave properly . The prayer in Buddhism is not a predefined rule set or the acts recorded on the tablet represents the law (referring to the stone tablet inscribed with the laws of the religion based on the Bible) . The teachings of Buddha are not spoken commands of a unique God, unchanging, all-powerful and created everything. Buddhist morality completely independent of any one mind or supreme spiritual behavior. Buddhist morality is based on the observation of the way in which we are living, and each of us can do it (that is, each of us must look at ourselves, consistent review their own actions and create a behavior consistent with ethical) .

In a certain sense, if you see Buddhism as a kind of dogma (doctrine) , immediately we will have to confront a hopeless deadlock (if Buddhist view is a doctrine the commandments precisely defined, Buddhist morality can not be voluntary revolutionary, viday will be a paradox) . So there is a form of orthodox Buddhism or any similar primitive Christianity or Islam?

Certainly not!

The key point is that place. If you become a Buddhist doctrine with the laws and rules set available, it would be the way that Buddhism denies himself. We (those of Buddhism) should not be looking for a moral foundation in the form of doctrine to which blindly followed. We have to contemplate whether what you're doing, what is desire and deserve to live like ...

Morality can only arise from the heart of every human being to help us integrate an absolute one do such taidung, by an extension is determined by heart.

What the Buddha said to the Sodi keep the vivid to this day because it is the word for us, protect us and cause us to be touched (the Buddha's advice rang in his heart touched yourself to what is no more as the Buddha taught, advised his own heart today and in the moment, and there is life in the teachings of the Buddha. Such life is the basis of Buddhist Ethics, and necessarily it is not a moral structure imposed, absolutely revolutionary and any mobile service) . If you look in the corner next to certain that it will not be anything more absurd is intentionally set up a theoretical basis to rely on it to build a foundation of Buddhist ethics.

All the ethical issues that the Western world often controversial - such as sexual issues (homosexuality, condoms-su, oral contraceptives, etc.) , suicide, causing death by medical means to avoid pain (euthanasia) , behave in social attitudes (comportement social / social behavior). .. - Do not carry the same meaning to the spirit of Buddhism (Eastern societies today has actually attracted by the material values ​​of the Western world, and embrace also the ethical issues not escape irrational and sometimes without realizing it) . Motivation and awareness in the minds of each individual human being to deal with each particular context occurs in a given time, will be more important than how search chibiet a real solution Mobile service. Buddhism not only hit manhden relative character of all phenomena (the impermanence and illusion of all phenomena represent a relative truth), but also to uphold the particular value where every human being in the each situation . For Buddhism is moral only temporary and patchwork, always looking to adapt to endless long string drawn between actions and consequences. In fact, if you try to specify the long link chain to turn it into something rigid, indeed it would be just a nostalgic thing.

Above is what shows Buddha unlike the founders of other religions. Moses (the founder of Judaism) Law engraved on a stone plate and his nation must follow that comply with, or violate it, will be punished by God (please note add a great author up in a Jewish family) . Entire social group to be loyal to Law Phapdo.

Vision of the Buddha opened it completely different. Buddha was an example for us to follow to look at themselves and transformed themselves.

Buddhist morality is always associated with how thiendinh?

Want a thorough understanding of the meaning of Buddhist ethics is what it is necessary to recognize that moral that thetach not left out of the meditation, which means we to behave like naode keep the peace always alive in my heart.

For us (the West) , the role of moral behavior margins regulations that we must follow. But in terms of practice, not sure we know how to do. Such as teaching children and youth ages must comply with certain rules, but does not explain them understand that compliance with that necessarily comes from our own inner ( for example, we teach children not to kill animals, but does not explain them understand there is a way to help them to respect and love of life, and that's the way we know launched to fine violence) .

We (the West) are not even aware that we are only interested in the theoretical aspects of ethics Denham distinguish it with practice, and to practice, we chixem it is application of the principle has been previously set by reason (ie theory) .

The integral is absolutely foreign to Buddhism. Because the Buddhist point of view, any thinking that does not arise from the sense of human experience in this place and at this moment are not necessarily thinking just a distracting (fall out made and lost its practical value) . The Way of the Buddha said that we are always obscured by the traces saved from the determination and confidence of their existing beliefs. Find a way to get out of them - then there is a kind of thinking alive! Thinking in terms of the application if it is not smart enough to help us deal with a situation occurs, the scene thinking it would only be a fourth single blind and invalid (out of the decision guess new and existing beliefs can bring their own thinking - that is freedom - but the free thinking that if they can not integrate with the felt experience of our pre-existing do to help us conduct a case to adapt to any situation happens, the tuduy he even is free but is only thinking blind and leave reality).

For the Buddha, even though we have hanhdong consistent with morality anymore but if the heart is full of hatred and fear, it is not a true moral action (though the outside is a direct action Lord thenhung resentment and fear in the hearts bold line marks on his knowledge to create good business not for yourself) . On the contrary, sometimes need to act harshly, despite the conventional moral standards so that we can respond more appropriately to a warning event occurs (for example, resistance was fierce to stop a violent action to protect the fairness and humanity, or to protect a being is in jeopardy, for example) .

So the difference between the moral precepts of Buddhism

and said any move orders of the Western moral

such as what were the philosopher Kant raised

and deeply rooted in the life of Western society?

Ethics of five Buddhist precepts, and of these, the first three precepts greater importance than the last two precepts.

These five precepts are as follows:

- Avoid killing the creature with sensory

- Avoid theft

- Avoid sexual socializing cause harm

- Avoid not lie, not to speak of bragging useless or say slander

- Avoid non-toxic

Buddhist ethics are not particularly Chuy ban any one thing and also not required to hold a certain attitude, but rather encourages us to avoid some of the attitudes behavior. The Buddhist moral precepts are not spoken commands with absolute character and is based on reason, and in view of Kant (German philosopher .1724 to 1804, founder of the theory of "reasonable supernatural ideas "- transcendental Idealism) , the said command aydong time, as well as the duty to take a pragmatic approach and global value. In contrast the ethical precepts of Buddhism, the only standards are set based on the observation of human life. According to the Buddha, people have transformed their mind like a sport to practice body. Motivates us in our determination that is his desire that more and know how to behave more human case before every scene and every moment. That determination can only come from our human place in the integrity of it - not just rely on the moral way of thinking, the reason or moral is enough.

Most people who follow the Buddhist path to voluntarily comply with the first three rules, or all rules, or may be more. They choose a certain time in the day to review the rules to keep (such as before bed, in the morning when you wake up ... to spend a few minutes to remember the precepts which they compliance determination) .

Avoid killing mean?

Not to kill that is not allowed to deprive the life of any living creature. Killers of course to bicam guess (not able to accept the death penalty in a country imbued with Buddhism) thenhung the prohibition that must be respected for all organisms from mammalian species, until birds, fish and insects. For Buddhism, the life of all creatures sensory recognize the suffering must be respected. We are not allowed to cause pain to any living creature.

For the Buddha, kill means deliberately deprived of the life of a living being. The practice must abide by certain rules given by the Buddha himself, and the more he explains clearly how an act of killing:

- [First of all] have a creature (the true existence of a being outside the mind)

- We recognize that there is a creature (the appearance of an object inside the mind)

- We reveal the intention of killing (volition appear in the mind)

We kill animals in particular how to use a certain method (intention translate into action)

The reason the Buddha on process analysis is to emphasize the role of the pulse energy within our mind to promote action. It is a way of reminding us always to increase awareness, and to understand that an insect is also a creature with sensory (être sentant, être sensible / sensitive being / beings know the pain. A few books English translates from Chinese as "sentient beings" (?), then it is a wrong translation means) so we can not be allowed its life tuocdoat; and if aware then it will also have a practice. If you see an insect crawling closer to his (or stick to who you are) , there is not a reason for that, of course, kill it. Avoid killing it will help us to realize a very transparent way, we have just launched camot operational structure (in his mind) to help me not cause pain, and furthermore I do not pressure put his authority up any thugi.

Killing is an extremely violent action because it is a destructive action is real (the life of a creature is part of the reality and the reality that his own life also) . Whereas the path of the Buddha is to accept as does thucdung like (ie, in its entirety) .

Why not steal?

The Buddha taught us not to take anything that other people do not.

Action heard others say cũngđã is a way that we are receiving a lot of things not on their own, but that is not much when we are aware of it. This is how we often defenseless put things depending on the field of love and see it is his own property, there is nothing because we are motivated by the things they want in the form of his feelings are lacking or not

The Way of the Buddha advised us the courage to look at the emotional stuff to understand that they arise from a lack of confidence absurd (we need some emotional love such and we seek to embrace those things from outside to compensate for the lack of, and the reason we lack nothing because we we lose the tutin where the) .

On the path, fullness (plenitude / fullness, fulfillment / richness and wholeness) is not dependent on petty things that we just want scavenged to make your own. Fullness arising from the way reveal confidence in his own dignity. Should follow that rule, it is a means to help rebuild their dignity and honor it. (About laws relating to theft is not too difficult to understand if the object stolen is a objects. Maybe so, but the author does not need to explain ramble about this event raised a form of "theft" or "scavenged" more subtle in terms of emotional or psychological, that is an appropriate emotion or emotional things that I feel "inadequate". ore seized or held will be used in the form of attention, and that is what will save the wounds deepened their knowledge on the line. Otherwise, it is creating "industry" being stored on the continuous flow of knowledge to force her into the cycle. therefore must be avoided not only reveal the intention of greed makes you stare at an object, but also wary of the "scavenged" take the form of emotion or sentiment that is as psychologically manifest in the mind her. This is how pure the mind and your heart to help yourself more confident in their own dignity. Thanks to his mind and heart will become the full and rich, and the wealth that will make you feel ready to offer with both hands what we have in our hearts when we see others in need. Moreover inner wholeness that I also segiup I found that is not there is nothing outside its worth for more scavenged Whether it is a physical or an emotional thing, too) .

Avoid committing the sexual hang causing harm mean,

and why must comply with the rules too?

Depending on the schools of thought that ethical sexual detinh poorly understood differently, but usually it means a sexual act that causes suffering. A more comprehensive understanding, poor sexual morality means a sexual act does not respect others, not to create a real relationship with him and did not need to know the consequences occur. It is an act detrimental to the spiritual existence of the Buddha in his heart, and not to arouse attention for yourself.

Why always keeping ethical behavior?

Some schools of thought deploy many ways so subtle inference to encourage people to enforce an attitude of moral conduct, and if based on general statements in the Buddhist sutras, you can call it a preserve not cause suffering to others.

In a Buddhist society greatest concern is to be aware that an act of harms - such nhusat birth, rape, steal, lie, slander - of course will bring negative consequences asphyxiated squeeze and engulf us in our suffering. Hatred leads to hatred. Violence leads to violence.

At a deeper level and also it is very easy to understand if you know choose an attitude of moral behavior, there is also a way to help me back to myself. Violations in the shameful act contrary only makes himself away from himself, separated from his own life. Too well, in the French language the word evil (mechant / nasty, evil ... / cruel, sea fraud, and bad ...) carries a very significant Buddhist which means "fell into the wrong wrong " (mal cycles / falling into the wrong) . Through expression in the French language, people is not evil cotinh but only because "fall into the wrong." So cruel is a thaido behave outside of ourselves and outside of our own aspirations. If you do not practice meditation very persistent, very difficult for us giucho my heart caught in jealousy, hatred and resentment. Meanwhile, the most obvious what we have created for yourself is happiness.

The Buddhist view of sexual problems a context,

there is any suspicion of problems like

for the religion based on the Bible?

Under the perspective of Buddhism, vande sex is not a sin. Just be careful that's all, that nothing is as it is easy to lead to a blind rather strange situation (being driven by the pulse of the industry and driven by instinct propagation makes it possible to fall in a state of ignorance and passion - like lightning - not wise enough to consider or think about anything else). wary of sexual desire and turn it into a pure energy pulses solely to kichdong of his, is a practicing healthy, fresh and absolutely necessary.

Buddhism views homosexuality issues like?

Who did not know homosexuality issue as old as the earth, but did not see a page of books that mention this problem. Socializing sex between two people of the same sex or not is not a reason to be alleged that judge their sexual behavior is correct or not. Their emotions and the mind is the standard help to evaluate their behavior. The essential thing is not to cause suffering to others.

On the history of Buddhism was found arise quite different perspectives.

In Japan, homosexuality was even allowed inside the monastery, sometimes organized in the form of ritual. The monks often came from the nobility or infinite, and in this world, homosexuality is seen as a form of cultural elegance and special esteem, not as inferior sexual intercourse between men and women.

Most of the social conservatives, such as China, homosexuality is condemned because it is a great thing, do not have children to continue the family line - ie no descendants to thocung he and she handed the family.

Homosexuality was once bicam guess so strict in Tibetan society. Some teachers today still continue to keep in view has been highlighted in many Tibetan books, said that "the sex organs to assist in reproduction between the male and female components gender; and Buddhist perspective, all forms of deviance are not acceptable. " Indeed very surprised to see the revolutionary statement "biological" as above was uttered from the mouth of the spiritual master of the field (most likely the perspective of the teacher on dayda influenced indirectly by one of the most crucial concepts of Tibetan Buddhism is the inseparable combination of compassion and wisdom, and this combination is often symbolized by the image combination masculine and nutinh, so some teachers "conservatives" always want to protect the image "cotruyen" and do not want to give it chipped) .

However, there are other Tibetan masters that homosexuality is no problem at all - what more principal is to be honest and to respect each other in the socializing, this is the true objective standard to evaluate a sexual act is legitimate or not.

In short every man who looked out the door to see if the right middle of the day or not (this proverb French means judging something or a certain event depending on their own views) .

In the West, it was different, we have to question whether there should lean tend to hate homosexuality (homophobie / homophobia) or not, things tend to go hand in all meaning religious thonam the (machisme / male chauvinism) is the extreme of a few Asian nations (of the very philosophical song if not very difficult to penetrate: the author wants to say is gay advocate absolute equality for in terms of gender - that men and women, men and women - while the hatred of homosexuality is a form of indirect policy contrary, ie male-contempt, and it is a situation backwardness that Westerners should be consulted before ngatheo tend to hate homosexuality) .

We (Buddhist) who have a duty to modify the moral precepts of Buddhism and criticized the prejudice laudoi that we today can not longer acceptable? Do we also have no obligation to accept it, but today we are no longer consistent with the teachings of the Buddha again, though for dieuay be confirmed by the leaders prestige? (of this sentence longer than that of philosophy song on this question. Firstly should be noted Western author who, writing for the West, in the context of Western society under pressure criticism of the tendency to hate homosexuality, and that's what pressure arising from the basis of their age-old beliefs. Conservative majority of Westerners feel I have a duty to resist gay sex because "evils" This goes against the basic principles in their age-old traditional beliefs.

Meanwhile, the Buddhists have a more liberal attitude, they do not HECO shall Buddhist moral modified to adapt to the context of today, they have no obligation to accept the things today they are no longer consistent with the teachings of the Buddha, even though it is due to the "respected leaders" to force them to accept.

For Buddhism, homosexuality is a phenomenon similar to thousands of other phenomena in the universe. If you look under a more limited angular, it is a social phenomenon similar to the other social phenomena, and if put out tuongdo into a more narrow field, it is an individual's career. It comes to business, they must understand that it is not a punishment, a destiny, nor does it represent some kind of sin.

People often misunderstand the way that machinery is something revolutionary negative consequences, like a punishment that an individual may incur. Thenhung from the program now means "action" (karma), and its deepest meaning is "action". If you have an "action", it always contains the meaning of a certain freedom. Likewise, homosexuality also carries a certain aspect of freedom, an individual "Tudo" bear the consequences brought from his actions and also "free" to create business for themselves by their own actions. In summary the Buddhist point of view, not a law or a rule to condemn homosexuality as a serious mistake, a sinful thing that violations must be marginalized social .

Homosexuality also appears in Asian societies similar to those in Western countries but with little more discreet and it seems pretty normal. Whereas in Western countries, homosexuality is a very thorny issue, hundreds of thousands to millions of annual demonstrations across major cities to demand the right to life, dignity, and as their equality in society and law.

Western societies advocated absolute personal freedom, but in terms of "morality" is so heavily influenced by the age-old religious tradition, sought to condemn some behaviors a completely depending on the individual areas (contraception, homosexuality, including rubber, etc.). This is the reason leads to a contradiction and paradox is difficult to solve. In fact, the so-"cuaay" of one's own, how to use it or not use it, it is the freedom of each person. The role of ethics is to put yourself in a higher position to focus on the peace and harmony in society, not should snoop the sex to condemn, because it was just a form daoduc communication direction.

For Buddhism, you should look at the issue of sexuality in general - in all its diverse forms and distortions of it - as a "concretization" of propagation. If you already instinctive, it is just a means by which used to dominate the industry, and human bondage. If you look at the twelve tie knot - also known as decimal binary condition - tied beings in samsara, you will see that the first bond, representing the primitive ignorance, is the underlying cause led to the birth. So if you want convicted should be sentenced to life, should not be sentenced to a form of "concretize" all of the energy propagation, even though they may be more or less misleading, because it is just a consequence necessity of birth only) .

Is it already time to fight violence of religion, a kind of spiritual security guard and human thexac that he just wanted to impose religious people, even sometimes by force.

Buddhist concept of how about using dungdong money?

Buddhism is little mention how to make money but on the contrary only interested in attitudes toward money.

Indeed, the rejection of wealth and vows to choose a life of poverty (renunciation) is a profound method to help deal easier by the influence of money. That is the way of the monks and nuns, their alms each day to search for food and there is a bit of improvement out and clothes coffee-laid on the people, begging bowl in hand.

In contrast, for secular, hotu because of looking for a means of living gives you a comfortable life, as long as not to let his means of livelihood was taken too far fall to fall into the ventricular expectations (not to be too ambitious, expected too large, planning too far, beyond his ability to then have to bear the failure) . Buddhism does not view poverty as an ideal as in Christianity.

Desire for money is nothing more than desire for other things, if there is a way to express your self, it will make yourself vulnerable to falling into the blind. As a Buddhist, not cling to money, not to own slaves for money - but not so that to refuse and denying money, not allowed to touch it.

The road was called the way trungdao. But the middle way? Indeed there is something quite strange to us (Westerners) , because we often have a habit of thinking based on the principle of duality (duality here that is a contrast or a the opposite: take the money or not having money. Middle Way is the path in between these two extremes) . Middle Way means not desire money, nor do not want money (this is the wording "of the expression" of fur: "not-to-be" and "not-is not-to-be, "Here are two of the four sides of a logic called from the opinion) . In summary, we have launched a real correlation liberal for money.

In other words, if we consider the search for money is the purpose of human existence, it would be an update dovo same short-sighted and irrational, and it is no different with the opposite attitude that is rejected money. In short the more important is the motivation tuben within one's own mind.

We may just want to make a little money but always let his obsession currency, or vice versa, just make a lot of money but said spending money to bring a more comfortable life , and at the same time neither cling to money that bietdau us, it was able to use it to turn itself into a generous man.

How to know that his actions

true or not

while to react quickly
to an event happening?

It is by analyzing the traces saved from his actions.

Follow the footsteps of the Buddha means to analyze each scene exact scenario happens more than most to find ways to deal with them most adaptable. There is no certain rule set available so that we can rely on that behavior. Books can decap a case of action required to commit murder - it is a case of killing a robber is about to kill off both a trade delegation to rob. (this is a story about a Bodhisattva precursor of the Buddha, kill the bandits to save the union on merchant ships).

Above behavior is completely different when compared with the views of the philosopher Kant. For this philosopher, lie ban such terms must be respected absolutely, not allowed any violations in the case. If it is so do have difficulty debiet that I can correct or not, just know obey the law is sufficient.

Buddhism opened up a completely different vision. To judge his actions and motivations out more dongay (action arising from a volitional consciousness, and volition, arising from a wounds sustained on a continuous serial stream of Knowledge. Department wounds turns attention because knowledge to express what the pentagon feel when exposed to the external environment, and that expression "wake up" and "provoke" wounds to transformed it into attention. followed by the intention to reveal to the outside by actions or words. summary of the reaction - ie reveal actions or body language - always reflect the pulse deep residue on the flow of knowledge. A practice must be consistent and follow the course that almost allows you the freedom to be your actions and words, do not allow the control of hazardous her. practice should not only look at the immediate action as a result, but also to look at the cause which is the deepest impulses in his mind) .

You may be wondering as to act for the sake of sentient beings, or just to make the map and his personal ambitions? In other words, the motivation of action you may have the heart to wake ( bodhicitta ) - (Bodhi Center) -of you, or it is only expressing to promote myself (narcissique / narcissistic ) or because of some fear?

If we look at this aspect, Buddhist daoduc will close with a form of morality (sagesse / wisdom / dexterity or wisdom) is a form of morality.

Remorse and guilt

have played a role in Buddhism?

There is no reason to be burdened by feelings of guilt. Not only guilt, no benefits, but also cause us to risk imprisonment ourselves on major minh.Day not a revolutionary sentiment Buddhism, because for Buddhist concept of crime the cardboard complete stranger, and more Buddhism always emphasizes the fact that from the inside of all humans have hidden a peaceful sutoan, and just make it out.

In contrast remorse can benefit. If accidentally broken a rule that I had been willing to comply, and if I feel I have not enough energy to perform your vows it, it's more important to be aware of that situation. Do not give up orange sections that should not turn a blind eye before the event. Both attitudes are proven to be irresponsible, unworthy of a mature man.

Regret self-indulgent (to do one thing not to do) will make their hearts collide, there is also a way to help me see more transparent way that he has committed mistakes and so you will know maintaining ethical careful.

When feeling remorse no longer tormented her, should also lend momentum to launch real determination to firmly follow the path of Buddha.

Why Buddhist ethics are promoted based on meditation?

Buddhist morality always requires every moment in life is the perfect moment. Zen Zen master Shunryu Suzuki once said the following: "To the kitchen or cooking is not necessarily just for cooking but also a practice. When in the kitchen, you have to express yourself through movement of the kitchen. Cooking does not only mean preparing food for someone or for you; there is an opportunity to express honest (sincerite / Sincerity / simplicity, simplicity and truth ) . When cooking, you have to reveal your existence through the motions related to the kitchen. You have to put all your attention into the kitchen, you just cook but the mind is in a peaceful and does not seek anything. You just know that they're cooking! That is the way to manifest your true form and simple and it is also a way to contribute to your own practice. "

We will be misled to believe that the mind is a way to create a connection that with an absolute thedang, with an ultimate truth, to God or enlightenment. This is how we think the spiritual path that we follow to take us to a place not even the illusion of this world. But actually, that's not the way of the Buddha. [Walk the path they] did not have anywhere else (to that expectation) , there is no such thing as ideal (to the target) .

Buddhist practice is directly interested in the reality with all its simplicity. That is not the way to help me find a way out. All the gestures and actions have contributed to the practice, such as the words for hello someone to meet each other, reveal an attitude that donao, wear, eat ... - All of which are moral (must stay aware and vigilant in its smallest cuchi) .

Not allowed to relax the mind Decho it spoiled the holiday.

No-action mean

and why it represents the deepest meaning of Buddhist ethics?

For Buddhism, live a songdao Germany that is always consistent is the right and good in every scene situations happening to help them behave in a natural way and in accordance with pm huongdo.

Buddhist morality is formed tucac experience felt in the daily lives of people. I go ngoaiduong and was thinking that I was going to attend the meeting, suddenly saw a man go ahead in distress (robbery, assault or stumble ...) . So how to react? A moral action is not necessarily only be phatdong based on theoretical considerations or which otherwise is due to the ability to xunhanh immediately before an event is happening.

This is a natural response to a certain special circumstances, and after that it should be further promoted by intuitive intelligence ( prajna ) (wisdom) . Buddhism called an action not found from any consideration of what is "non-action".

Non-action does not mean "do nothing" but in fact do - but not for action "" do not reveal is the determination of a distinct entity for the purposes of the subject was more prominent (eg charity, but is not aware of his generosity, giving something and give to someone, so called not-published-for but in fact, is released-for, because behind the act of giving still hidden a determination of a subject with a wide open heart and hands to your back) .

The event-action inside-action (such as his generosity without knowing that the alms) seems to be a paradox, but also can be understood as an individual action and individual actions that go beyond dualistic character (no subject and object) . Although individual's actions, but do not let the idea of self in his first find a possible gaps can be observed and changing external context (related to hanhdong of individuals that) . Feel the experience was really very simple and anyone can do. For example, while the fitness competition (to focus on cacdong effects, such as high jump, or use the foot kicking a ball) , construction (focus on the subject) , cooking (see where the country Boiling not, it's time for the vegetables to the pot or not ...) - the time that the idea of his ego can sebi blur to help her integrate into what you're doing.

Buddhist art in general and most especially Japanese art often evokes the obvious fact that no-action character. Brush tops of a calligraphy surfing on the paper it looks like the will itself, the artist did not think of himself as the driver of the first movement where the pen. A musician pulling paste hocam can but feel that you are not playing that the music tuno are melodious. Full integration with the musician what they are doing, dendo no longer aware of the movement of the fingers, are not aware they are using instruments including the fact that you are playing music. Observer - ie self-conventional role of criticisms and judgment of what we execute (interpret the phenomenon is happening) suddenly disappeared. We fully integrate into our actions are executed. But not so to be sure that we have fallen into a state of "unconscious", on the other hand is on the other because at the very moment, our presence in reality become more solid ever (we integrate into what is happening and in which the ego will disappear, to become a reality and reality is one, no man, nor any self both) .

Why in the history of Buddhism

there is despite ethics teachers,

sometimes even seems to look down on others?

Is it an eyesore?

Indeed, in countries such as China, Korea, Tibet, the result is no longer strange seeing a monstrous real socac teachers, despite ethical and would love to try to tease those who tend to think honest and one-dimensional. Attitude of compliance (the conventions and the formula style) sometimes also be considered as a permitted practice for some schools of Buddhism - it is also a way to reveal the strength and causing shocks in the teachings of the Buddha.

Rather, there is a teacher who mocked morality. There is nothing for them there a few you notice daoduc is very easy to be able to become a republic modeled (conformism) sometimes can be seen as a kind of hypocrisy in society.

It is this behavior that the teacher has to adapt to the scene direction occurs (there are scenes to deal with provocation and violence) . This is also a reminder for us to understand that enlightenment is sometimes detected by a concussion (choquant one / shocking) somehow. Ethics is also a great exercise allows relieve us of the burden of emotional narrow regarded himself as the center, and most are aware that not only ethical compliance is sufficient but also to liberate people from what insanely trivial and both their the worry sotrong heart (fear of committing mistakes or fail to comply with the rules ...) . An attitude of the most adaptive behavior for a police case occurred not necessarily be perceived from an external perspective of the attitude (that is very hard for us to judge an action or a when his behavior stand to third vitri) .

People often say to this phenomenon and see it as a "wise madness" ("une Folle sagesse" / "a mad wisdom") , the a wisdom or nendien muscular when required to conduct real adapting to moral, wisdom to folly takers can express their views freely. But it is a true expression of love, an ultimate form of ethics (Zen master Lin not hesitate when rolled his eyes and cut off his finger a disciple people imitate him put a finger up and did not answer every time anyone asks anything. meditation sukhong angry name dares disciples to imitate him but he only wounded him and cling to imitate What a stupid way others do. Name disciple too soom bloody hands and run. purse teacher not be forgiven but also poultry daoduoi by. The disciples return to see his teacher rolled his eyes and put a finger hand, while his fingers have been cut away, he suddenly awakened and suddenly attained enlightenment. Just ask the liberty to remind those who love in our hearts is not enough to reveal a similar strength as teacher Lin, do not imitate his way of teaching was) .

Meditation, ethics and intuitive understanding

For the majority of people practice Buddhism, the entire teaching of the Buddha can be summarized in three key points as follows: morality ( shila ), concentration ( samadhi ) and the intuitive understanding ( prajna ) (location property) . That's three power contributes to liberate our minds. The way of the Buddha is a combination of three training allows him (religious, spiritual and religious wisdom) .

Ethics is the most beautiful dress that people can put on yourself. The shirt that arise from his heart to shine and shine within man himself, and then the wide spread in the world. It can help us protect the most perfect and worthy of his. The shirt that will impact every action, our gestures and words.

Meditation keeps us on the ground and opens up for us a lively atmosphere full of. It's like riding a horse so that we can most help us return to our own mind and prevent yourself from becoming a victim of all anxiety and doubt.

Understanding intuition helps us to get a transparency all things true. Learning in its own right is not necessarily a good way to gather knowledge is to become a scientist, but rather help us to know why and how we did not do be yourself.

People often borrow a water container and the image of the moon reflection in the bottle to symbolize the importance and correlation between the above three power sources (morality, meditation and wisdom) .

Ethics is a vase, symbolizing our behavior and attitude that is also what contributes to protect its own people.

Meditation is like water in containers. We have to practice how to keep quiet in order to turn it into a real mirror in the morning.

Intuitive understanding represented by the splendor of the moon reflection in the water bottom.

If the vase and swaying, the dirty water will resist lemon and do not reflect the intellectual shadow of the moon.

If the ball is shaken, the moon and how water in the pot can receive the full beauty of her body in the universe. END=VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY THICH CHAN TANH.VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST NUNS.GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY.AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.26/8/2012.NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).