SAID THE FRENCH AS CHIEF JUSTICE.

Font size:

One of the important issues that the Buddha often suggest we should should caution against the problem says.

Say how beneficial and say how did not favor is a matter of thinking through the crushing us. Chinese proverb: ' the old password entered, Tung Tung '. Sick by eating means that disasters do say that.

From real-life medical shows, words not the blades, but it has the ability to kill people by saying the words network cruel cause others to transport or live in hatred and misery. In contrast, words nor dose nutritious, but it may be the material makes the listener feel cheerful and happy. Perhaps that is why the Buddha when explaining the origin of suffering again mention hull: 3, and Italian industry. Relatives and colleagues of two Italian expression gateway. Which export industry is a very important gateway, is the enforcement of the will to let out the words ugly or nice. Of course, speaking with wicked words is one of the causes that bring himself or someone suffering loss of happiness; On the contrary, says nice words, it's not the harmonious making others feel comfortable please but also make yourself feel happy as well. Perhaps that is the reason the Buddha to the Buddhists ' no mode was lying ', as does the others lying lyrics but also harmful to myself.

However, there are some exceptions, cannot be true, because of the outspoken talk honestly sometimes harmful to themselves or others. For example, to find the bandits who plundered the property, you know he/she is hiding place or spot to the other, but cannot honestly just point them to the bandits, here is a typical example, truth in life and don't know how much story left horizontal. If the Buddhist, how is lying? based on the standards do not fall into the crime of lying? Or said another way, how called the speech be beneficial and how the words have no benefits?

This is also the problem that foreign leaders had words Nigantha Nataputta, belonging to the States-na-had instigated The matter Prince Abaya, to victims humbled The Religious Faiths in question two hooks, recorded in ' Prince Abhaya ' (Abhayarajakumarasuttam)[1] No. 56, as follows:

This Prince, go to Sa-subjects to speak, after Gotama with Sa-subjects, as follows: ' Bach The Gotama, Like Hybrid can say words, because words, others loathe, don't like? ' If the Sa-subjects acknowledge are saying Gotama said so, the Prince put the issue with Sa-The Religious subjects: ' Bach, Gotama, if The Religious manners so, nothing wrong other guys wife with him between qualities? because the Lady said verbal prompting guys qualities in others disfavor, dislike. If the Sa-keeper Gotama answer he does not say the words say so, then the kidney problems with Sa-World then why subject Gotama: Devadatta outrage, not welcome with The Religious teachings of the wedding?

This Prince, Sa-Gotama, when Prince sports questions two hooks so will be unable to eject nor can swallow to. Because as an iron hook stuck in the throat of someone, who is not able eject nor can swallow to be. Also, this Prince, Sa-Gotama, when Prince sports questions two hooks so won't be able to eject nor can swallow to.

Through this event, it is suggested to us, however, that the Dhamma that the Buddha said is the truth of life, however it is what is in contrast with the thoughts of the Indian people, especially those who bought glass Sikh worship sung or philosophy. So because the extra glass his religion for the teachings of the Buddha became the object of critique or criticism of foreign leaders, because he was talking up the truth of life. The truth that accidentally has hurt the existence of death to their system of doctrine. In fact his teachings do not aim to attack or fight to break any religion whatsoever, nor does it aim to include adherents of personal interests, or the shaft of his doctrine is the doctrine comes up the truth of life, affordable which is the meaning of saying:

We do not argue with anyone in the world, the only people in the world of time arguing with him.[2]

Indeed, throughout the life of him, Mr. Hong does not have evil intent to injure the life of anyone, always take the tolerance for use with everyone. But while he's teaching, exposition of the truth don't do avoid the dissatisfaction of the people not the same perspective. People here have a point which we should note and sympathy is, thought and life of the Buddha is too great, the charismatic and attractive to intellectuals and the Kings, who have the money, who became disciples of the Buddha, Buddhist supporters and increase delegationthat is why layman envious with Buddhism. they want to survive and keep credibility, no any other way by scuffles breaking or reducing the credibility bar foil Buddha, by looking deep debate with him. Nigantha Nataputta instigated events Abaya to argue with the Prince in the Sun is a typical specific. However, that dream has been accomplished or not, that's not depending on the wishes of his completely depending on ability and truth. The result of the debate as to how, we listen to the Buddha replied:

-This Prince, Prince thought? If the children Court, due to the accidental death of, or due to inadvertent's breast, thọc a rod or swallowed a stone inside the mouth, so the Prince to do?

-The Sun, the White right hooks to out. The White World, if your child can't hook out immediately, with the left hand grasping the top of it, with the hands grab the finger do the hook, the hook of her out, will give the oil has to bleed. Why so? The Sun, because the transparency that compassion child"idea.

The Buddha did not answer directly the question of Prince Abhaya, which the Buddha replied with the question in reverse. Means taking the enemy's answers do answers for yourself, this is the way that the Buddha is often used when the enemy had no debate and start unlocking, maybe that is the way most convincing answers and do not take the time to argue the long line. Here, if the Abhaya Buddha with want to catch secret question 2 hooks, meaning how well the answers fall into seven of the enemy, but here we see the Buddha does not fall on the lever, by his cunning, His charity to ask another problem also similar to give the enemy responded. That meant enemy reply how, that is also the answer of the Buddha.

Here, the Prince Abhaya must answer the question: If a child swallows a mouth or stone on the nanny or parent how to behave in front of that action? should override that baby, use of dangerous machinery hand out or for fear of crying baby objected to the baby swallowing dangerous animals on the abdomen? With this question, Prince Abhaya had only a single answer, accept for the crying baby to the hook of the danger out. This answer means acceptance of the views with the Buddha, sometimes He speaks French, the words who displease it nothing is not logical, because sometimes people hear is people who are superstitious, or biased or poor levels of immature, then he certainly does not agree with his teachingsso the disapproval of the Buddha is often. But that does not mean that words have no value or with malicious. event Buddha say these words make others unhappy is because the purpose of doing that, and the benefit to the beings make others unhappy, with contrast. With this sense, the Buddha has a thorough analysis of the case stated or not stated as follows:

Also, this Prince, (1) any words such as Futuristic as real, not know not like feet, does not correspond to the purpose, and he makes others dislike, distaste, as Hybrids do not say words.(2) any Such speech is as real, such as Hybrid said, does not correspond to the purpose, and he makes others dislike, distaste, as Hybrids do not say words. (3).And words such as truth, such as Hybrid said, corresponds to the purpose, and he makes others dislike, distaste, As Lai here know the interpretation of words. (4).Any Such speech is not as true Hybrid said, not like the legs, does not correspond to the purpose, and he makes others not preferred, as her words. (5).Words such as truth, such as Hybrid said, does not correspond to the purpose, and he makes others reluctant and love, like not saying words. (6).And words such as truth, such as Hybrid said, corresponds to the purpose, and he makes others reluctant and love, here, as Lai said while explaining the lyrics say. Why so? This Prince, as the future ecommerce idea wholeheartedly for the organic situation. "

Through the content and meaning of the Bible have leads on shows us, the word of the Buddha say never also based on 3 principles: the first is the truth; the second is the purpose (i.e. things that you want to say it's related to the enlightenment and liberation or not); and the third is the listener is preferred or not. Based on this condition, the Buddha continue to analyze, there's 11 schools meeting the Buddha didn't say, only 2 schools meeting the Buddha said, but to select the word. 4 where the Buddha didn't say is:

1. words such as real, non-Hybrid knows no such as legs, not corresponding to the purpose, and he makes others dislike, distaste, As Hybrids do not say words.

In the first meeting, the Buddha School does not say because it is not true to the facts, not linked to the enlightenment and liberation and the listener also loathe dislike.

2. any Such speech is like the real thing, like Hybrid said, does not correspond to the purpose, and he makes others dislike, distaste, As Hybrids do not say words.

In case 2, the Buddha did not say, because it is not linked to the enlightenment freed, simultaneous listeners also don't like, so the Buddha didn't say.

3. any Such speech is not as true Hybrid said, not like the legs, does not correspond to the purpose, and he makes others not preferred, as her words.

In this case, the Buddha did not say, because it's not true to the facts, there is no contact to the enlightenment and Liberation, but that it is very medicinal is preferred. For example, with the sweet compliments with the purpose of the shaft turns.

4. any words such as Hybrid known as truth, such as legs, not corresponding to the purpose, and he makes others reluctant and love, like not saying words.

In this meeting, the Buddha did not say, because it's not relevant to the enlightenment freed, but that it is true that to be another favorite, but still not be the Buddha said. For example the Hunter asked: have the deer ran into this direction? If there are more then the Buddha recommended that we should not be telling the truth about this meeting.

In addition, there are 2 Conference halls was the Buddha says:

1. any words such as Hybrid known as truth, such as legs, corresponding to the purpose, and he makes others dislike, distaste, As Lai here know the interpretation of words.

2. any Such speech is like the real thing, like Hybrid said, corresponds to the purpose, and he makes others reluctant and love, here, as Lai said while explaining the lyrics say.

In this case, the second case, there is nothing to dispute, but in case 1, we should explain to issue more understandable. In this case, 1 meeting that it was not fancy, but for others it is true, more related to the enlightenment freed so the Buddha chose words that tell the truth. This is where the Buddha said to the truth of the time led to the layman did not like, but can't so that the Buddha did not speak to the truth of the time.

In summary, out of 4 in the case that the Buddha didn't say, certain key elements is that it is not linked to the enlightenment and liberation. In contrast, too, 2 school meeting which the Buddha said, the main reason is it related purposes. So, from there we can lead to the conclusion that the problem is related to the enlightenment and Liberation, Buddha said that problem was and vice versa, will not be the Buddha discussed.

From this sense, we can define, words do no contact to the enlightenment and Liberation, the speech was viewed as sayings fib, or rather speech not be beneficial, speech is the Buddha recommended that Buddhists should not say; And on the contrary, the words are related to the practice, helpful to the enlightenment and Liberation, the speech was viewed as sayings true, words have benefits. The Buddha advised we should say the words she said, whether people listen to loathe. END=VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY BACH LIEN HOA.( TAM THANH ).MHDT.19/5/2012.NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).