According to Buddhism, the great human situation.
The self-employed
person yourself, no one entity or any higher power can decide its fate.
The Buddha:
The founder of the religion, Buddha (if we may call him the
founder of a religion in the conventional sense of the word) is a unique teacher
did not call themselves anything else than a human is purely a human being.
The other
cardinal position is either God, or God incarnate in different forms, or the
revelation of God. Buddha is not only a man, his back was a man claiming to be
a revelation not from any god or any other power. He said everything he done, to be
achieved and completed, are entirely from effort and human intelligence.
Only human
beings can become Buddhas. Everyone in her ability to become a Buddha if they wish and
effort. We might
call the Buddha was a great moral Man. He is so perfect in "human nature"
that his later, in the religion of the mass, he was regarded as a
"Superman".
"Self is our shelters for us, who
else can do helpless?" <! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [1]
<! - [endif] ->
He advised his disciples to "take
refuge in himself," should never seek refuge or help from anyone
else<- [If! SupportFootnotes] ->
[2]
<- [endif] -> . Ngai giang day, khuyến khích người
moi VO co va tu su to any VA Tim giải Minh Chinh cho thoát, VI con người von tu
co Luc at MOI rang giải thoát khỏi sure buộc no va tri Thu Minh Chinh Cua Luc.
Duc Phat Day:
"Nhu Lai Cac đức<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [3]
<! - [endif] -> Giang day đạo Chanh, Nhung nguoi
chinh cac Phai việc cua minh lam. "<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [4]
<! - [endif] -> Neu Người ta goi đức Phat The MOT
"Jang Cuu the" Cung thi ra tim đà Ngai who will go with those đường Đi đến Giai
thoát, Nyet-ban. Nhung you chung ta, ta Phai bước thirty đường
Ay.
Because the principle of personal
responsibility is that the Buddha to his disciples completely free. In economic Mahaparinibhana
(Great Eight Nirvana), the Buddha taught him never thought control Sangha
(Sangha)<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [5]
<! - [endif] -> and he did not want this mass
depends on him. He taught that in his teachings, no mystical theory,
nothing to hide in "virtue fist Teacher" (acariyamutthi), or in other words, he
did not hide anything in the sleeve at all.<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [6]
<! - [endif] ->
In the history of religion,
there was no other religion have a freedom of thought such as Buddhism.
This freedom is
really necessary, because according to Buddha's liberation depends on the people
directly receiving the truth, not in favor of a god or an external power to
reward the submission.
Once, the Buddha's visit
Kesaputta Kalamas in a small town in the kingdom of Kosala. When listening to the Buddha, who
Kalamas He visited and transparency:
"O Buddha, there are many
Brahmin hermits and Kesaputta visit. They explain and clarify his theory, but
despised, condemned, all chain theory of the others. Then there are those
Brahmin hermits and others also explain and clarify their own theories,
despised, condemned and vilified the theories of others. But bhante, about us
section, we always doubt and confusion, do not know who among the Brahmin
hermits and revered had told the truth, who said wrong.
"
Then the Buddha gave them
unique advice as follows:
"Ask people Kalamas, ye doubt,
confusion is a must, because the problem was very suspicious. Q Kalamas people,
not to be tempted by the words narrated, or by tradition, or by the rumors. Do
to be guided by canonical authority, or by deductive reasoning, or by the
reliable appearance, or by the pleasure of thinking about the views, or by what
seems reasonable, or by the thought: "This is our teacher." But ask Kalamas,
when you yourself know something is immoral, wrong, bad, then get rid of ... and
when you yourself know what is good, good , then accept, to follow.
"<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [7]
<! - [endif] ->
Buddha went further. He told the bhikkhus that a
disciple should be judged even the Tathagata (Buddha), to be completely
confident that the value of their teachers are under.<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [8]
<! - [endif] ->
According to the teachings of the
Buddha, comfort (vicikicha) is one of the five hindrances (five females,
nivarana)<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [9]
<! - [endif] -> , nam against ngai of Hieu Biet
chan cho cho ly goes on Tien Bo Linh Tam (Cu bat hay cho tien bo NAO).
Tuy nhiên, Nghi
Khong Phai The MOT "toi loi", Boi Khong Vì Trong Phat Giao Có Nhung "tin điều".
Here tea, Trong
đạo Phat Khong co "toi loi" theo Hieu Nghia "toi loi" vai tôn Trong Khac Giao.
With the kings
of xau moi cua minh xa VO (avijja) goes TY Kien (micchà ditthi). Điều Khong mot cai beyond
the choi bao lau with co Hoai Nghi, hoang mang, do du, the Khong thi bo tien nao
Có. Cung Khong
the choi cai Rang Hoai được Nghi Tranh được Khong Khong Hieu Người with ma khi
ro, ro thay. DJE Nhung holds xa hon, thi Tuyet đối can Phai xa lia Hoai
Nghi. Muon Khoi
Hoai Nghi, Phai thay can t ro.
The problem is not that one
should not doubt or should believe. Just saying "I believe", does not mean that you understand
and see clearly. As students solve a problem to stage do not know how to
proceed, it will fall into doubt confused. If in doubt, he can not move, so
you definitely comfortable. There are workarounds, but do not just say "I believe" or
"I do not think" that solved the problem. Committing oneself to believe and
accept that he did not understand all, is a political attitude, not a spiritual
attitude or knowledge.
He always skeptical all
chains. Even
when he was going away, leave a few minutes before death, he was repeatedly told
his disciples to ask if there are technical doubts about His teaching, to later
regret not because it can not all questions . But the disciples were
silent.
When the Buddha was a very touching
words: "If so respect that the Tathagata can not ask anything, then tell
everyone you know" (which means that each person ask you what you ask it for
questions).<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [10]
<! - [endif] ->
Not only the freedom of thought,
but also the grace of the Buddha, have made use of religious studies by
surprise. A
youth so in Nalanda, a wealthy and prominent name advantage-she-li (Upali), a
disciple of the sect in family friendly list-element Ni-Kien (Nigantha -
Nataputta) of Jainism of Mahavira Jaina, Mahavira was dispatched to meet the
Buddha to debate and all I few points in the theory of karma, because the
Buddha's views on other issues with the view of Mahavira<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [11]
<! - [endif] -> . Trai ngược you mong đợi, Upali sau
khi Tranh Luan Nhan Phai chap rang when Nhung điểm đức cua Phat goes beyond đúng
điểm quan cua minh thay know. Ong cause the boi ta xin đức Nhan Minh Phat lam mot DJE
already you tai (Upasaka, uu-ba-Tac). Nhung đức Phat Bao Ong lai ta hay
Suy Nghi, đừng go you go, there "of x and t can đoán than rat tot cho Nhung
Người lac loi NHU NGO." Khi Upali Nhung lap lai xin loi cause, đức Phat khuyên hay
Tiep Tuc Kinh Ong Trong Nhung I go there thay ung cu cua ong ta Nhu
trước<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [12]
<! - [endif] ->
.
In the 3rd century BC, the
Buddhist emperor Ashoka's kingdom of India, following the example of grace and
virtue exalted understanding, respect and uplift have all other religions in the
Empire His broad. In a statement of the Emperor carved pillars now we also
read:
"People should not only respect
their own religion and all I religions of others, but to respect others
religious reasons or other reasons. Thus we can make their own religion and help
develop other religions. If not, where one has buried digging his own religion,
and also harms other religions. He who only respect their beliefs and all the
credit chain other beliefs, in fact they did this because of the devotion to
their own beliefs, thinking, "I will honor my religion." But on the contrary,
when do they hurt their own religion in a more severe. So perfect harmony is
nice: everyone should listen, and willingness to listen to the theory that
someone else initiated. "<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [13]
<! - [endif] ->
Here we should also add
that the spirit of sympathetic understanding that now needs to be applied, not
only in matters of religious theory, but also in other
jurisdictions.
Tolerance sympathy from the
beginning he was one of the most beloved ideal of civilized culture and
Buddhism. Thus, throughout the history of missionaries in 2500 years,
Buddhist Asia, and now has over 500 million followers. Violence, in any form, any
argument, also absolutely opposed to the Buddha's
teaching.
People often ask: Buddhism
is a religion or a philosophy? Call it, that's not important, Buddhism is Buddhism, though
here you paste onto whatever brand. Brand is dependent. Even brands that we set for
Buddhist Teachings Buddha also not relational. The name that we set for Buddhism
is not essential.
What's in a noun?
Rose flavor was even more names.
Rose flavor was even more names.
Also, do not need brand
truth, it is not a Buddhist, Christians, Hindus, or Muslims. Truth is not exclusive of anyone.
The sect mark
is an obstacle to understanding the true self in a way, and they give rise to
harmful biases in human thought.
This is true not only in
matters of intellectual and spiritual, but also in the communication between
people. For
example, when we meet someone, they do not look like a man, we gave them a brand
such as English, French, German, American or Jewish, and he reviewed all the
prejudices associated label was in our minds. But he can be completely beyond
the attributes that we assign to them.
Man enjoys the
distinguishing marks, so they put him on all the brands on the virtues and
emotions that everyone has. They said to the "type" of different charity, such as:
Buddhist Charity and Charity Christians, and despise the other brands of
charity. But
charity can not be a partnership, it is not God, Buddha, Indian or Muslim.
The love of a
mother for the child is not a Buddha or God: that is motherhood. The qualities and human
feelings such as love, charity, compassion, tolerance, patience, friendship,
desire, hatred, lazy late, ignorance, pride, etc.. no need to brand partnership, they
do not belong to any religion at all.
For the seeker of truth, a
thought is due to come from non-relational. The origin and development of a
thought is the problem of scholars. Indeed, to understand the truth, we do not even need to
know from the Buddha's teachings, or from someone else. It is essential to clearly see the
problem, understand it. There is an important story in the Central Business
(Majjhima-Nikaya) (Business 140) to clarify
this.
One day the Buddha to stay
overnight in an artisan workshop of pottery. Also in the workshop had a young
hermit there before him<- [If! SupportFootnotes] ->
[14]
<- [endif] -> . Ho Khong biết nhau. Duc Phat sat người quan tu va Nhu
was an "Thanh Nien is no co Nhung Cu Chi đáng men. Ta Hoi NEN xem've người Mom."
Hoi Phat Boi
đức the người is: "Hoi Khat was<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [15] <! - [endif] -> , Nhan Danh to ban ma bo đà you
already đình? For there thay cua Ban? Ban cua thuyết Thích ly to?
"
The young man replied, "my
friend, a recluse Gotama Sakyan, has abandoned the family to become a hermit. It
was rumored that it was an Arahant (A-la-drought), a level omniscient. the name
of that holy man that I became a hermit. He is my teacher, and I like the theory
of man. "
- So that holy man, the
A-la-draft, who was omniscient now where?
- In the land to the
north, to ask you, is a city called Savatthi (Sravasti). The Blessed One there is who, the
A-la-droughts, who are omniscient.
- When you have that you
did not, who did the Blessed? If you meet him, you will recognize him or
not?
- I have never seen him
Buddha. If
you meet him, I do not recognize.
Buddha realized that his
name that this strange young man gave up and became a family doctor begging.
But still not
to reveal traceable. He said:
- Ask Dr. beggar, I will
teach you the theory. Let's listen. I would say.
- Yes, you say go.
Young
people's approval.
When the Buddha was teaching the
youth a most impressive sermon of truth (which we will present the essential
points later)<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [16] <! - [endif] ->
.
Only after hearing the Dhamma is
complete, a hermit named Pukkusati realize that people say to me is the Buddha.
He lowered
his feet Teacher ethics, and sorry for him because he did not know which to call
Him "you"<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [17] <! - [endif] -> . Roi Người Ay cause xin đức Phat
Truyen rejoiced PHAP go vao đoàn the Nhan Minh Tang
already.
Buddha had asked him y, bowls
ready (a bhikkhu - monks - have 3 y and a bowl for alms). When Pukkusati no answer, the
Buddha taught that the Tathagata (Tathagatas) shall not life up for someone if
they do not have available medical or bowl. So go find Pukkusati y and bowl,
but unfortunately he was crawling along the butting death<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [18] <! - [endif] ->
.
Later when he reached the sad
news, Buddha told his disciples that Pukkusati is a holy man saw the truth and
has reached the stage near the end of the road made Nirvana, and be reborn into
a realm , there he will become an A-la-drought<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [19] <! - [endif] -> leather goes Cung chet DJE bao
Thu Phai Khong gian tro lai the nay.<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [20] <! - [endif]
->
Through story we can see
that when Pukkusati listening and comprehension of the Buddha were his
teachings, he does not know who is telling who he is, or there is the teaching
of one. He
found the truth. If the drug or the disease will heal. No need to know who makes the
doctor, or from where it again.
Most religions are
established on faith - rather, blind faith - but the Buddhist emphasis on the
"notice", understand, be acquired, rather than on trust. In the Buddhist scriptures written
word Saddha (Skt. Sraddha) usually translated as faith, trust. But saddha is not "faith"
in the conventional sense, but rather it is "credit", arising from the
determination. In Buddhism popular and in common usage where the
scriptures, we must recognize the term "saddha" has a meaning of "faith" when it
is explained by the refuge in Buddha, Dharma (Dhamma) and Increase (Sangha,
Sangha).
According to Asanga, the
great philosopher of Buddhism in the fourth century, "credits" has three
aspects:
1) The trust and integrity sure
about something.
2) joy serene about the virtues.
3) The desire or wish to complete a goal to pursue.<! - [If! SupportFootnotes] -> [21] <! - [endif] ->
2) joy serene about the virtues.
3) The desire or wish to complete a goal to pursue.<! - [If! SupportFootnotes] -> [21] <! - [endif] ->
Although understanding how much
faith in the sense that religion has very little relevance to
Buddhism.<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [22] <! - [endif] ->
The problem arises when
faith no evident - that all makes sense. As we can see, the problem
disappeared faith. If I told you that in my fist with the pearl, the problem
posed for the trust you do not see a gem. But if I open your fist and only
jewel, then you've found the problem posed no longer trust again. So in the ancient texts
have a saying: "Get to know as we find a jewel in my
palm."
A disciple of Buddha, a monk named
Musila told another: "Hey you Savittha without faith<- [If! SupportFootnotes] ->
[23] <- [endif] -> , long tin bucket sung Bai, Khong
can Thiên vi ua thich hay, Khong can nghe loi hay đồn đãi truyền thuyết, Khong
xét đoán can be ngoài Nhung Le Ly, Khong can Lac su thu tu trong quan Duy ve cac
Niem, thay rang Toi va su biết Cham dut CUA Niết sinh tu la-ban.
"<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [24] <! - [endif] ->
And the Buddha taught, "Ask the
monk, said that the eradication of evil, is impure so that a person has seen and
known, not for someone who does not see and did not know. "<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [25] <! - [endif] ->
The problem has always
been known and seen, not private. Buddha's teachings are called Ehi-passika, invites you to
"come to see", rather than come to
believe.
In the texts, the word always
refers to people who have the truth that "the French label (Legal eye:
dhamma-cakkhu), not dusty and dirty, has arisen:" The What was the truth, have
entered into the truth, has overcome skepticism, he no longer hesitated.
With true
wisdom, he see them as they (yatha bhutam) "<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [26] <! - [endif] -> . We đến of jackets ngo cua chinh
Ngai, đức Phat day: "With mat đà sinh phat, phat tri đà sinh, sinh Kien Giai đà
phat, phat Anh Sang đà sinh"<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [27] <! - [endif] -> . Luon Luon djay there on your hay
thay Biet here tri (Nana-dassana), chu Khong Phai beyond tin tin đức Tuong
here.
This point is increasingly being
lauded at the time that orthodoxy Brahmins forced to believe and accept the
traditional course and the competence of their unique truth. One day, a group of
educated Brahmins eminent visited the Buddha and a long debate with him.
One of the
men, a young Brahmin named Kapathika sixteen, was considered intelligent all
four of them, asked the Buddha<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [28] <! - [endif] ->
:
- Lord Gautama, is the
last of the old biblical Brahman proceedings be transmitted continuously through
oral transmission of texts. Of texts that he, a Brahmin who had this absolute
conclusion: "There is new here is the Truth, and everything else is wrong."
So Gautama
faith will say about that?
The Buddha
asked:
- In the Brahman, a
Brahman himself any claim to know and see that "this was the only truth,
everything else is reasonable mistake?"
Honest young man
replied:
-
No.
- So, how can a teacher or
a teacher of teachers in the Brahman's Saturday back on time, or even to any one
person among the first authors of the economic that case, has stated that he
knew and saw: "There is new here is the truth, everything else is
wrong?"
-
No.
- So, they resemble a
string of blind people in tandem, the first not seen, nor of the middle and last
but not seen. Thus, it seems the situation of Brahman as the situation of
a string of blind people.
He then for a group of
Brahmins very important advice: "A wise man should not keep the truth come to
the conclusion:" Only this is true, and everything else are false.
"
When young Brahmin asked
him to explain the meaning of a "truth maintenance", the Buddha
taught:
"A person who believes
something. If he says:" It is my belief, "such as medicine has been keeping all
these facts. But he can not reach absolute conclusions:" There is new here is
truth, and everything else are false. "In other words a person can believe
anything arbitrary, and can say" I believe that. "So y is respect for the truth.
But he should not because trust him to say something that only medical news is
the truth, and everything else is wrong. "
Buddha said: "The attachment of
something (an opinion), and other scorned things (different view) seen as
inferior - it is wise to call a fake chains."<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [29] <! - [endif] ->
One day the Buddha
taught<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [30] <! - [endif] -> cho Môn DJE ly thuyết Nhan you
here, go I rang đà Thua thay go Hieu ro điều Ay. Duc Phat lien
day:
"O bhikkhus, even this conception,
transparent and clear like that, but if he hold on to it, if you prefer it to
him, if he kept it, if he was tied with it, so he did not understand that the
doctrine only as a raft, but actually used to cross the river, not to hold that
hug. "<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [31] <! - [endif] ->
Elsewhere, the Buddha
teaching this famous metaphor, in that doctrine is like a raft used to cross the
river, not to hold and carry on their
backs.
"O bhikkhus, a traveler,
to a large river about. Coast is very dangerous side, but on the other side is
peace and no danger. Not have a boat to the other side of river nor have a
bridge to go through. He said to himself: "The river was wide, this shore full
of danger, but on the other side, the peace without danger. No boat to the other side, there
was no one to bridge over. Therefore, it would be very good if we collect grass, wood,
twigs and leaves to make a raft, and raft through which the other side for
peace, using our arms and legs to overlap. "Then ask the Monks, who was
collecting grass, wood, trees, leaves that make a raft and the raft was taken by
the other side peacefully, overlapping with his limbs. After crossing the river
to the other side , he thought: "The true friends of this has benefited us a
lot. Thanks
to it we have to pass in peace river side, overlapping with our hands and feet.
It is worth
to take the raft on top or on any of us go back.
"
- How he thought the
teacher asked the monks? If he do so, the action of y has to be a proper action for
a friend or not?
- Buddha,
no.
"Then we should do with medical
raft? Having crossed the river and to the other side, suppose he thought:" The
friends of this fact has a great boon to us. Because it had to come to this
river peacefully side, overlapping with our hands and feet. We should leave this raft on the
water, then continue to go anywhere. "It is an appropriate action for the raft.
Also, ask the monks, I have taught a doctrine similar to a raft, it remains to
pass, not to carry, hold on. O bhikkhus, understood that the teachings just like
a raft, then (dhamma) he must forsake all, let alone more illegal
(adhamma)<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [32] <! - [endif] -> thi lai cang xa bo Biet nen chung
NAO. "
From this metaphor is
clear from the teachings of the Buddha in order to lead people to peace, purity,
happiness, attaining Nibbana (Nirvana). The whole theory of the Buddha
that lead to the goal. He did not say what, but just to satisfy intellectual
curiosity. He
was a practical teacher will teach everything happily bring happiness to
people.
Buddha once stayed in a
forest Simsapa in the Kosambi (near Allanhabad). He holds a handful of leaves, and
asked his disciples:
- Ask the monk, the
brothers think? Leaves in our hands more or more leaves in the
forest?
- Blessed, leaves in the
hands of the enlightened few, but it leaves in the forest Simsapa indeed more
numerous.
- Also, ask the monks, it only
teaches them very little from what we have is their explanation. What he did not tell the
truth, the more numerous. And why did not the Tathagata teaching these things?
Because it is
not useful ... does not lead to Nirvana. Thus, we did not say those
things.<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [33] <! - [endif] ->
It is useless for us when
trying to imagine - as some scholars have tried to in vain - what Buddha said
but did not tell his disciples.
Buddha did not want to talk about
metaphysical matters not required, the sole realm of thinking, the generality of
the imagination. He saw them as a "forest concept." It seems that the disciples of the
Buddha are also people who do not like his attitude. Where he is a Man of the pupil
(Malunkyaputta) were asked 10 questions sparse renowned classical metaphysical
issues and ask the Buddha replied.<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [34] <! - [endif] ->
Malunkyaputta One day,
after the session of meditation on the driver, went to pay homage to Buddha, sat
down on one side and asked:
- Blessed, when I was
sitting in meditation alone, this idea came to me: "There are issues that the
Buddha did not explain to to the side and remove. This
is:
A. Everlasting universe, or 2.
not lasting;
3. Space limited, or 4. infinite;
5. The soul is one with her body, or 6. another soul other body.
7. Germany has also the Tathagata exist after death, or 8. He does not exist after death.
9. He just does not exist just to exist after death, or 10. He just does not exist and neither does not exist.
3. Space limited, or 4. infinite;
5. The soul is one with her body, or 6. another soul other body.
7. Germany has also the Tathagata exist after death, or 8. He does not exist after death.
9. He just does not exist just to exist after death, or 10. He just does not exist and neither does not exist.
These issues were not the
Buddha explained to me, this attitude is not unsatisfactory. I do not like her
attitude. I
will go to the Buddha and asked him about this sir. If the Buddha did not explain to
us, we will give them mass up and leave. If the Buddha knows the universe
eternal, let him say so. If the Buddha did not know the universe is eternal or not
etc.. do not
know a person should be frankly, "I do not know, I do not
know."
The Buddha's answer to
kyaputta Malun-benefit results for millions of people worldwide are now wasting
precious time on the problems that perplex the metaphysical and mind is an
unnecessarily:
- Malunkyaputta this, we
have never said to him: "Come, Malunkyaputta, live the holy life under the
shadow of me, I will explain these things to him or
not?"
- Buddha,
no.
- And he, this
Malunkyaputta, he told us: "Buddha, you will live the holy life under the shadow
of him and he will explain these things to
children?"
- Buddha,
no.
- Right now, Malunkyaputta, do not
say to him: "Come live the holy life under the shadow of me, I will explain
these things to him." And do not tell us: "Buddha, you will live the holy life
under the shadow of the Buddha and he will explain these things to you."
In such
cases, ask the other crazy people, who denies it? " <! - [if! supportFootnotes]
-> [35] <! - [endif]
->
Malunkyaputta asked, if
someone said, "I will not live the holy life under the shadow of the Buddha if
he did not explain to me the problem was" then he could die before the Tathagata
question is answered. Suppose, asked Malunkyaputta, a man shot poisoned arrows
and friends brought her children to a medical doctor. Suppose then the other person
said, "I'm not going to draw this arrow out if we do not know who shot, he is a
Delhi Police (Ksatriya) or a Brahman (priest-class) Coffee or a clinic (Vaisya,
commercial farming class) or a la Prime momentum (Sudra - the caste), his name
is, the family was, he high, low or medium height , who was black leather, brown
or yellow, he came from any village or urban provinces. I will not to draw
arrows if we do not know what kind of offers we had shot, cord was, kind of
arrow What, what to do with hair made of and what the name. " Q Malunkyaputta, he will
die before knowing what any of these questions. Also, ask Malunkyaputta, if a
person says, "I will not follow the holy life under the Tathagata ball until he
answers questions such as whether the world's longevity, etc..", He will
Tathagata died before being answered.
Then the Buddha explained
to Malun-kyaputta that holiness does not depend on these views. Although people have the
idea how to go about these things anymore, it still birth, old age, sickness and
death, benefits, compassion, sorrow ... that the cessation of these things
(ie Nirvana) is said can be done right in this
life.
Therefore, this
Malunkyaputta, keep in mind in mind: what we have explained, is considered to be
explained and what we have not explained it was not considered to preach.
What is
something we have not explained? World eternal or not etc.. (10 of these concepts), we have no
explanation. Why, asked Malunkyaputta, but did not explain them?
Because it is
not useful, not related to fundamental spiritual holiness, does not lead to
boredom away, liberation, the cessation of suffering, the peace, the
penetration, passing the corn- the table. Thus, we were not talking to him
about these things.
But what, asked Malunkyaputta, we
have explained? I explained that suffering (dukkha), the cause of
suffering, the cessation of suffering, and the path leading to the cessation of
suffering<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [36] <! - [endif] -> . Hoi Màlunkyaputta there sao ma ta
đà Giai Thích Chung? Boi Loi Vì nó ich, nó when HE CAN ban đến đời song thien
thanh tam Linh, nó đưa đến on Chan bo on Giai thoát, Cham dut đau kho, on An
Tinh on Tham nhập on lieu Ngo, Nyet- ban. The TA đà Giai Thích Boi chung.
"<! - [If! SupportFootnotes]
-> [37] <! - [endif] ->
Let us now consider the
Four Noble Truths that the Buddha told that he has explained Malunkyaputta.
HET = NAM MO Guru Shakyamuni PHAT. (3 LAN)
.24/32012.
V. Lessons QUESTIONS FROM
"THE BIGGEST ENEMIES OF LIFE"
Through what we have on this analysis,
especially based on the
Buddhist-Soul, we can
draw the following
lessons:
1 / LIFE is impermanent, JUST LIKE Dream =
Understanding of selflessness,
our implementation is largely self
France. Everything in this world only by the grace of,
we penetrated the impermanence of
the earth.
Men and women have
different flowers.
At the new rose bud looks really
cute, and then from the start it until
it looks blooming lovely,
with gorgeous scent makes people
thoang I fainted.
Then the petals and deep wrinkles
with acrid acrid smell to finally
wilting flower, the petals fall gradually.
This is the civil law,
based, vandalism, destruction of creating h box ; no one avoid off! Clearly understood as
such, it has not been put in the mind,
not unhappy when impermanence of
our application.
there and take it.
different life with a ton of
pottery have enough joy, anger, love, staining we are just actors,
just as the audience. Assigned positions that we
have more than a drama that we play directors, ministers, prime ministers, the president ... in the year,
ten years.
When the curtain, we were
civilians again.
If we try to cling to the that
role, we thought it was real,
it is permanent, then you take it,
we will be very
sad.
Venerable Master Hua is teaching: "Remove tops the original
run, get to the real author, is recognized as the enemy. Who does not wake up, still living
in a dream and attachment of the dream realm. " Do you ever think you're living in
a dream as big as the dream fable Nam Kha in Vietnam or not? There you will protest
immediately. Ridiculous! If I'm dreaming, I pinch the meat in the know pain,
I hit his hand hard on the table
saw, my contact with people and have felt happy contact, sad, angry, hate ... Even when I'm crying, my tears flow.
How do say is fake? So I ask you, you are
sleeping at night in bed and dream of a nightmare, your extreme fear and tears,
you light up your knees wet. Such as in a dream, you see, are really living your life
like that. If
you know it's fake, you have woken
it!
Thus,
Diamond Sutra ends with four
shelves are important:
"Necessary legal compounded
translates as "All
compounded
Nhu you,
Huyen, Bao,
Anh
Nhu you,
Gia, bot, Bong
such as herons like to reveal e n
as well as flashes of lightning
mist
improvisation as market consistent
" should initiate such custom
"
"Friends of" what is all generals should look impermanent
and birth and death.
All compounded things are like
dreams, are authors such as bubbles when rain falls on the road, as the shadow
people and things in the wall in the sun, like dew drops on flowers morning, as
well as power flow by lightning flashed when going to rain. Let us often think of life as
such. There is nor there, "not without sharp sharp! In this world,
where nothing is stable,
where nothing is immutable.
Quan thus, we are new surrender
Center, New Center of dwelling.
Often when that dream a beautiful dream, I want it longer.
Conversely, when having a nightmare, I want to wake up
quickly. Thus, happy people living with fully furnished material not
usually think of spiritual practice. After all, this world, where
nothing is sure? Even the floor, the road that we
thought was solid when, standing on it to open up when the
quake, recently appeared hell holes in many places, especially in China.
Before the
natural disasters such as hurricanes, tsunamis, floods, volcanic eruptions,
forest fires, earthquakes, meteors, epidemic ... I feel so small. When given the opportunity
to sit on the plane and looking down, saw their homes, cars no different from
children's toys and people can as small as ants. Also, on this earth, no place is
really safe when outside the aforementioned natural disasters, human beings are
causing the terrorism war to kill each
other?
All what he thought was his, is certain, that could endure
forever collapse, disappear overnight. Therefore, in the Lotus Sutra,
Buddha for this world as a house that people burning themselves playing in it as
childish. According to the Mayan calendar, Doomsday (Doomsday) is
dated 21/12/2012 when a giant asteroid bumped into our earth. Hearing this, are we do
not have a response back? For me though this is true or false, here is a warning to
mankind and advised people to love one another, "hidden, in healthy" because
only new merit ear to help people, the victims from . Faced with natural disasters,
epidemics, war, all we can do nothing but what we can do, it is on ourselves.
We can
prisoners, merit to be able to alleviate the karma that we ought to pay, as our
ancestors used to say "Germany to win some." Anatta is on the absolute
selflessness but Russian is fairly fake fall on the side. Relative and absolute are two
sides of one reality. Through life, even love expectations, illusory, relative,
we must have a duty to prevent the evil, so do the good because "human authors
but also counterfactual" and karma will follow us like shadows with right image
in a dream. To edit your application in good standing, we should
remember what a Tantric Master taught: "Be always aware of the illusory dream life to reduce
craving and hatred. Let's have a good mind for all species, have mercy mind
whether others treat you like. What else do not matter to you when you see as illusory
dreams. The
main point is that you have good intentions in a dream.
This is key. This is truly Tu Tam.
"
2 / DO NOT
ego = Buddha advised us not to see
that "own" is real because it causes any problems as described in the "weakness
of the ego" (III 2b), so it is not his enemy or
what?
3 / Please return WITH GENUINE ESSENCE, THAT is Buddha
nature = Knowing the "own" is what
"assume", we will turn to what we "have it" to be happy forever. That is the Buddha nature
inherent in each of us. The Sakyamuni, who tell us that the true value of our by
declaring: "I am the Buddha, sentient beings will become a Buddha." I recall a fable about
true self in Indian philosophy: There is a lioness about to give birth pregnant
but hungry too so nibbled the village. When the stream, mother lion labor
and delivery and a lion. But the lion exhausted mother had died on the banks of
streams. A
goat shepherd boy discovered the arrival of the four tri shouted. Villagers to take the lion
mother and lion owners. Lion raised in his herd of goats and goat thought.
One day the
princess lion seeking prey, beside a stream to drink. He herd goats and goat hide away
in fear when the lion looked around, asked: "friend, friend." The male lion was
surprised, just angry lion went near and said, "You are a lion is not easy!"
Lion constantly asked: "friend, friend." God was very angry lion grabbed
the lion neck then dragged to the banks of streams senh Shakespeare, thrust his
face close the water and said, "Take a close look to see if you are?" Lion
roared inspiration from his face and a hours. Forestry has the image of
God!
This story is to say each of us
descended from the Buddha, but we thought ourselves as
living beings. We do not know or could not believe this is like my lion is
thought to date is easy to master God said that death as well as the Buddha tell
us of the dignity that each of us.
Some people wonder why I sure do not see the Buddha Nature?
This is difficult because the Buddha Nature and the
absolute formless so even Buddha can not use words to express, which can only
indirectly used as "finger pointing the moon." Do you ever look directly face
you? You must
use a mirror, then see the shadow of it, right? Soyal Rinpoche, a Tibetan teacher
of the twentieth century raised 4 "bug" makes it difficult to see the Buddha
Nature, which he called "mind
nature":
"Self-identity too close to the
point that it is difficult to
realize,
It's too deep to comprehend it difficult to
detect,
It is always present is too easy to make money do not
believe it,
It is so immense so we do not use floating.
"
These analyzes of Soyal Rinpoche
makes us remember the Sixth Patriarch Hui Neng (638-713). When the open market was five, he
joyfully exclaimed words the essence of mind: "It was unexpected nature pure
equity,
Self-doubt where birth and death nature of
capital,
Self-doubt where the full capital
nature,
Self-doubt where nature which does not
oscillate,
Self-doubt where you want legal
nature or birth. "
Said above, sure you still see vague; so I add the teacher
leads Bankei (1622-1693). In his book Mind unborn, he had only one more clearly so
that we can recognize in himself the Buddha Mind: "The Buddha mind that you have from birth and the unborn
really is a public lighting photo. Evidence of this is while all of you listening out there
that I said that caw, Chip Sparrow sound, sound of wind rustling ... although
not intentional discrimination, but the sound that you will still recognize and
distinguish each sound, this call is heard for the unborn Mind ...
The real life that is the source
of all things, is the starting point of everything. There is no problem because what
does not kill the artifacts are not destroyed, so to say real life is eternal
then of course ...
What are the Buddhas past evidence
is any living mind and what future Buddha is mind without birth certificates as
well. Today
we are in the dark age, but only to a person residing in the unborn, the Dharma Center also
revived then ... Let's recognize explicitly that the lighting was not born and is the true
magic that Buddha is mind. An accommodation right in his mind between now and then
ever after, you are a Tathagata level living ... "Soyal Rinpoche distinguish two
prominent aspects of the Mind:
-Mind "normal" (Sem) capable of
distinguishing, conscious duality (good-bad, love-hate, take-up v ... v).
This mind
should cling to the self born of a desire, anger thus creating karma, brought to
life and death-rebirth and
suffering.
-Mind "by nature" (Rigpa) is the absolute, not involve
change and death (usually longer and does not kill) "Mind the course" not only
in our minds only, in fact it is the nature of all things, all phenomena in the
universe. Soyal Rinpoche also said that the natural mind is called
"God" with Christ and Judaism, "Great Falls" with Hindus and "Buddha Nature"
with Buddhists. So how can we back to the Buddha
Nature?
Buddha has shown us so many ways (method) to customize each
individual's inborn that application. Persons with inborn high, teachers
practice the DC is also the basis of low, medium or practice the Salon teachers.
The issue is
important to practice Buddhism, not only theoretical because we can not
distinguish Tri to "see" Nature is but to "see-know" by Wisdom (also known as
Tri Prajna ). Fundamental ways in primitive Buddhism is based on Virtue,
Wisdom.
-Keep the world is to not cause
more bad karma, so that life is not disturbed, so we'll calm, easy to
cultivate.
-The mind is not being attached by
the scene outside and not be disappointed by the inside of distracting thoughts.
Want to have
mindfulness right concentration, that want to practice mindfulness, the four
foundations of mindfulness.
-Wisdom is the penetrating truth
of all things in us humans as well as in space, like a mirror in the morning
faithfully reflect all "as it is" (as it is) no more, no less. So wisdom is
awareness.
We can take for example a glass filled with water from a
muddy potholes after rain. If a piece of paper to write an
inscription on one side of the glass, we could not see anything through the
muddy water from opposite the glass. We should not shake the cup or in
a glass stirring rod taken, such as the "do not hold the world"; as the more we
can not see anything through the
muddy water cool. On the contrary, we should stay where it is a glass of
water for several hours, the sand will settle to the bottom glass symbolizes the
"Policy". Finally, when water in the cup has become transparent, we
will see the text clearly palpably through the glass, this wallet for "Wisdom."
This is the basic principles of
meditation and the way has helped Sakyamuni's enlightenment under the Bodhi
tree, clearly comprehend all of the heavens perhaps legendary,
freed forever from birth and
death-rebirth. Buddha His other provinces in that our
24/24 and we are still asleep,
"opened my eyes that dream."
4 / TA who decide our own destiny .
Life is like a mirror because when
you raise your fist up, fist raised in the mirror and back, and if I laugh in
the mirror and smile back. Law of karma in Buddhism is so clear, but we must
understand this law in three times: past, present, future, because people must
be planted on the coast, the last bear fruit. We do not see what was happening
but got immediate conclusion is not true causal laws, that "God has no eyes."
Teilhard de
Chardin, the famous French theologian, said that why we all recognize that the
laws of physics in the universe as we do not believe in the laws of morality,
ethics in the spiritual world. In Buddhism it best: "To know life before that person how they see their
lifetime . Want to know how the next life he
shall also see how they live out in this life. " So we are owners of their destiny, happiness or unhappiness
is something we decided, not by anybody else, a different
punishment.
Religion Buddhism is a hard to hear. Not everyone is blessed with
enough grace, enough to accept radical. How can an ordinary person could
accept the idea: I am the author, life is just a dream? The ancients said: "Drugs are
bitter disability leave, so the offending words." How good is good enough but not to accept the kindness that
kindness to rise above, to Hue tu tu, not only blessed. The vast majority of religious
Buddhist blessing now, only few people from Hue. Tu blessing is not an act of cruelty, often do good for the
purpose of enjoying the natural consequence. There is merit, how much they
enjoyed good results but it is still within samsara as scholar Nguyen Duy should
have said: Chains of gold also remains
whether x i ch to human bondage like golden cage is also the prison of
birds. The
problem is broken gold chain or cage to escape prison. Thus the Buddha advised us from
Hue to escape from prison "Three Realms". Only so can we master the new
greed, hatred and delusion in themselves, master mortal-and if we have
Reincarnation rebirth, it is by prayer, not by industry.
Buddha said something real
fashioned: "Victory sa thousand enemies outside the field not by themselves win.
Win yourself is the most resounding.
"
5 / Middle Way "Happiness NOT
FIRST"
This is the most important
lesson, but the highest and most
confusing.
Most of us come to the crossroads,
but there are a few re-attach to selflessness. Buddha said they thought things
should be conditioned where nothing is real at all, death is all that is foolish
not to enjoy yourself in every way, including the killing of others.
Just like a
dream life, no soul, no retribution, but to fear nothing. But they must understand that
every person has consciousness as described in section (III-3). If there's "fake" the
results also have "fake" and the dream they are still paying the retribution,
they still have a taste of romantic suffering in the scene, not run away to be
both.
When the theory of selflessness, the Buddha did not want to
not because we accept as such, is worse than serving in there, but he just wants
us to see the true nature of the Self to not be attached. When you see the nature of things
is dependent origination, we find it has no true identity, is there or not.
Therefore, we
do not attach to a crossroads and did not accept the selflessness, the
disapproval is called the Middle Path, also known as "First means no."
Middle Way
means "no there is not no".
Middle Way does not mean that the synthesis between the Yes
and No, which is the Vietnamese super concept from the world. Middle Way does not mean
the intermediary between the Yes - no, often-paragraph, on uninterruptedly,
Passion-Fun which means beyond the extreme that, outside the ring relative to
the difference may manifest Vacuum Noble friends, definitely not heard the
thoughts and words. Reality escape four concepts: Yes, No, usually, paragraph.
This is in
economic duality Vimalakirti. Meaning in the Middle Vietnamese is super attitude
detachment, invisible universe, ie not being dependent on a prejudice, not
framed in a category that thought. Middle Path is done without being attached to the Yes and
No: Need user to strive Falls, to compete for more advanced science, the life is
more prosperous but should not get caught in the crossroads it indicates thought
to myself that should selflessness application to remove the boundaries between
ourselves and the people, to more friends and fewer enemies, to bring happiness
to people around the world.
Buddhists have a saying "Depending on conditions that are
invariant" means the case that we tackle, but stick to liberation and salvation
mortal beings. Therefore, when a man does something like that but actually
transgress the purpose of level, to help others. Te Cong Hoa Thuong was born to
break the general observance of human beings. However, there are those who rely
on to do things about it and said that he illegally accepted break. Buddhism is very
susceptible to evil fallacies advantage for their bad behavior. Therefore, we must be wary
not to fooled.
VI. KET
Luan
In Buddhism, the so-called "own"
only
* Links to the five aggregates,
and not the other core.
* So that the convergence of
conditions and also by the dispersion of conditions that
kill.
* And did not have an immortal
soul that after the four elements of this body panels collapse but of rebirth
consciousness and professional
help.
It is the sense (rather than a
physical entity) of this body and mind through all the actions of body, speech
and mind.
The Buddha pointed out to break
the selflessness of our ego. Anatta doctrine breaking down the distinction between our
people and to bring equality and harmony among people together, to see happiness
of their happiness, ranging from immeasurable mind: loving kindness, compassion,
sympathy, and equanimity to all
beings.
No-Soul is a truth, but do not
hold it in my sleep ethical
metaphysics.
Should see a correlation between Radio and Friendship,
between No and Say, between self and phenomena, between the Absolute and
Relative, between mind and France, between Buddhism and Human excess surplus.
When the
realization of selflessness then we still have to live and bring the body
temporarily, but we assume no enemies at all. Well, it is convenient or
retrograde means to practice, "borrowed author from the foot", to achieve True
Happiness.
And the most skillful means to
break the ego, which is oriented to serve beings, is to develop Bodhicitta.
Thus the new
Ta increasingly smaller, the new one perfecting himself in the words of
Venerable Narada taught: "Serving to become completely and totally to serve."
END=VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY BACH LIEN HOA.( TAM THANH ).NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).24/3/2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment