WHO FOUND LEGAL HE SEES THE BUDDHA,WHO FIND HIM BUDDHA FOUND LEGAL.

Thursday, 8 December 2011

Who found legal he sees the Buddha, who find him Buddha found Legal

Content which we will discuss in this short article is "Who is that he sees the Buddha's law, one that he sees the Buddhist law." Actually, this topic is not the author himself put that capital is the Buddha's teachings, are found many places in the business A function or Nikaya.
Causes Buddha said all this, because false religious Vakkali home potters, are being seriously ill, dying, but the heart is like face to face with the face of the Buddha and bowed before his eyes last passed away, but it is impossible to arrive at the Exalted, so Religious Vakkali has assumed market assumed to also appeal to the Buddha in his place. Because the heart from sharp body of the Buddha had visited Vakkali Bhikkhu. After the Buddha asked:

- This Vakkali, if he does blame the rules, so nothing Wondering or regretful?

- Have long revered transparency, I want to to see the Blessed One, but the body is not strong enough to see the Blessed One ..

- Well, he said, this Vakkali, there is nothing to see for yourself what this stinking. This Vakkali. Who found legal, he sees me, who has seen me, he sees the law. [1] .

Above is the dialogue between Bhagavan and Vakkali. Through this dialogue form, it suggests we understand some basic issues in Buddhism. The problem that we need to first determine where it is. Vakkali Bhikkhu Buddha and stand two different positions. Vakkali Bhikkhu stand from the perspective of emotion, with reverence, bowed and eyes to see the face of Buddha last time leave bare eyes. However, no standing Buddha from the perspective of this affection, comfort Vakkali.

Otherwise he stood from the perspective of a visiting guru and education Vakkali last Vakkali realize the truth to be enlightened and free, so he was saying: 'there is nothing to show for the family This foul '.

In my opinion this word has two meanings. Meaning he wants first transmitted to us is, he is human like many other people, so his body is like many other bodies, are also needed food, sleep, and status sick sick and excretion. The substance is excreted in breath smell like everyone else. Do not be naive to think that the Buddha is no longer the phenomenon.

If we had said that the Buddha and other beings, the difference it's just the difference between perception, ie the difference between the enlightened (Buddha) and unenlightened. He has no more enlightened kind of psychological suffering, but suffering in terms of natural kinds is still as hot and cold, sick hoan.vv..

In the unenlightened, have both size and physical nature of psychology. In fact, the most popular large format size of humans is known about the psychological, not physical. Monday, he'd say, Vakkali who live too heavy on emotion, too focused on the external form of the Tathagata, do not see the real value from within which he is under the tree of Bodhi. The value of the Sakyamuni Buddha, the truth is not good 32 or 80 general beauty. So Vakkali want face to face with the body of the Blessed One to do? Helpful for relief severe illness which he suffered? There are going to help the imminent death that Vakkali face?

Prior to this suffering, only that the Blessed One was teaching a new certificate may also terminate or at least alleviate the suffering of Vakkali, the measures that need to be truth Vakkali see face to face before death, if not living the monastic life in vain, no benefit what their situation is to benefit beings.

So the truth of which he was under the Bodhi tree is what? That doctrine of dependent origination (pratiya-samutpada), the principle of operation of man and the universe, the earth does not have an object, a person survive or disappear without this principle. This is the sense that the Buddha presented in the "Business Journal A function" with the following contents:

"French coast because we do not start out, not because someone else made. Although there appeared unto me, or does not appear in the world, this still exist. As this enlightened self-Lai, the primary sensory level ... " [2]

Buddha's teachings that enlightenment under the Bodhi tree which is dependent origination is the principle of dependent origination operation of life, not by the Buddha himself created, but it is the principle of operation of man and the universe , not something someone outside the operation of this rule, so called doctrine of dependent origination is the truth. From the Buddhist truths are meant as such, is not the word lake maps, lack of facilities.

Based from this doctrine of dependent origination, the Buddha points out human nature does not have something called self (atmam) or soul, these things always change in a state of transition, the shift Buddha called it very often (anitya), does not have legal standing still fixed. Beauty, wealth, status .... Although we have tried to keep anywhere, and also subject to change at some point. The difference between a wise man and fool is right or wrong perception, that is our attitude about how this situation.

The location is certainly not forced to do something contrary to the rules, so as impermanent transition, so that people do not mind living with anxiety or depression such opposition, only last like fools catch the animals at rest in its sole discretion. Want to be a cause but not born of suffering.

So compassion deep moral beings in suffering, the Buddha according to radical and different levels of each being, all the different means used to being only see this truth, that they are enlightened and liberation that formed sects, sub-division is Great.

From this point it suggests that we understand, the French dependent origination, impermanence, selflessness is the truth, the means or the various forms of education, it is not true, because it only has value, and in accordance with a specific object and certain, not be the truth for all people and all different social, so do not be called truth.

Here I want people to notice something that admiration which is very good and very necessary, but we should not confuse admiration will mean an understanding of Buddhism. Starting from cult admiration that we speak so indiscriminately, sometimes injuries to Buddhism.

For example, we often say that Buddhism is the truth, while we introduce some views on Buddhism, it is not worth anything related to human life, sometimes harmful for life. While efforts to introduce the Buddha, made people see clearly the truth to be enlightened and free, we do the opposite to introduce people to the point of social confusion, darkness, lack of facilities, lack of scientific light.

So how do these views that the truth be known? Maybe that is true and reasonable for a certain element of society, but not all, so can not be called truth. That is why the Buddha without understanding our news as we destroy our butts. Activities of the mind and heart are two different areas, both essential for human life, but not interchangeable.

Hearts and minds, but instead think of the life they appear to know how the chaos and confusion; minds that replaces the heart work human life is like as the court's activities project, so we should not confuse the mind and heart. In my opinion, should live together in the hearts and minds to work with.

Through the presentation on it to help us explain the question: Who is that law, he sees me, who has seen me, he sees the law. Here we show the concept of the Buddha, so this question is to understand who has seen the law, he sees the Buddha who has seen the Buddha, he sees the law. France here only for the teaching of dependent origination. Who can see law of dependent origination, he also see the impermanence, egolessness of things and even myself.

Who saw the impermanence Anatta then he can not accept: "This is my my my self", as such, be enlightened and liberated. Here, the concept of enlightenment and liberation are conceptual description of the results to see and know, from that used in Buddhist wisdom is the result of the practice of the Buddha under the Bodhi tree . This enlightenment has made himself free from all the suffering bound, so-called liberation. Anyone enlightenment as he will also have the freedom as he is not high not low.

Contemporaries also had many people of many different classes to practice his teachings, were enlightened liberation. After living in his teachings, enlightenment is liberated, they feel that the difference between the way the practice of Buddhism and the traditional religions of India so far. Buddha then advised people "to Buddhists to see and know, solve suffering, not to believe" and other religions, the faith placed heavy mantras and prayers.

That's why many people say after hearing the Buddha went legal statement:

"It's amazing because instead, Sun assumed Gotama! Religious author Gotama, as the upright what was thrown fell down, exposing what was covered, directions for those who lost, or bring light into the darkness to those who have sharp eyes can see. Also, the Chief Justice has been used many Gotama Ton author means to present and explain. " [3]

Thus, the hallmarks of Sakyamuni Buddha is enlightenment liberation, not 32 or 80 looks pretty good general principle to become enlightened liberation is seen to be impermanent law of dependent origination selflessness. So, who wants to see the Buddha, then he must find the solutions. Also, who has seen the law of dependent origination impermanence Anatta means that he saw the Buddha, Buddhist concept because the concept of law only to see the truth and the truth.

So if you want to rate faced by the monks Vakkali Buddha should be face to face with enlightenment and liberation, as if to show admiration Vakkali Buddha is Vakkali should practice his teachings, if you want the Vakkali except for their suffering they themselves have enlightened Vakkali interdependent origination impermanence and selflessness., even if Vakkali want of the first sentient beings to enlightenment Vakkali truth. It is the content and meaning question: "Who that law, he sees the Buddha who has seen the Buddha, he sees the law" when he encouraged monks Vakkali billion was ill.

Though, this is the teachings of Bhagavan for Vakkali Bhikkhu in the past. I believe, the content and meaning of it is still practical value for today's Buddhism. Are we trying to smear lipstick gold good general praise of the Buddha, 32 but we accidentally or deliberately forget that his teachings have enlightened?

Is reverence we use all praise and introduction of the super Vietnamese Buddhist philosophical system, but we forget that the young generation of today's generation is growing up in the social progress in science and technology, and are trained in advanced education system, with high professional qualifications, they will be difficult to accept these views obscure the lack of science. While the majority of people in today's society, interested in issues related to human society in which they survive, are not issues of a metaphysical philosophy.

I believe, the doctrine that the Buddha was enlightened teachings to people, to whom the Buddha was human education. Though the teaching system that addresses solving specific problems in the past, sometimes no longer suitable for people and society today, but through other forms of education, it still lies a mental principles of education that the Buddha wanted to send for the next generation is not the same society and territory. That principle, that spirit is the absolute value, applicable to all times and people.END=VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY BACH LIEN HOA.NAM MO SHAKYAMUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).OM MANI PADME HUM.( 3 TIMES ).