Chapter 3: ethics and Buddhist Precepts.

 

The remedy of this world,

and a lot of ridiculous since,

But there is a remedy can match with French Leaders.

Because of this, the Bhikkhu stilts, please pick up that medicine Bowl drink.

Drinking bowl of French Leaders drug

will not age any more, will cross to the other side of death,

and will sail up and see the truth,

The Bhikkhu on stilts, it is helping to end thirst,

and going beyond thirsty.

The Buddha

Buddhism has encouraged virtuous or not, and if so the principles of what's ethical?

Questions on this seems really simple but incredibly complicated, actually. So first of all as we do what is ethical?

The philosophical basis for the Western metaphysical as well as against the religion based on the Bible, morality is the widget offers the standard is supernatural, such as on the bad or the good rule by God or by reason to impose.

Buddhism doesn't advocate a concept similar to that.

It can be said it is helping us to behave in the right way. The Scripture in Buddhism is not the precepts are preset or laws inscribed on the plaque symbolizes the law (like say to the stone plaque inscribed carvings of religious laws based on the Bible). The teachings of the Buddha is not the judgment ordered by a unique Sky, immutable, omnipotent and all creation. Buddhist morality is completely independent of any will to paramount or a divine conduct whatsoever. Buddhist morality is based on the observation that we are living, and each of us can do it (which means each of us to look back at her, a review of the action yourself and give yourself a proper conduct with ethics).

According to an understanding that, if viewed Buddhism as a dogma (doctrine) then immediately we will have to confront a stalemate not outlet (if viewed as a Buddhist doctrine with the specified command available, the Buddhist moral can't take voluntary character isbecause it would be a paradox). Then there is a form of orthodox Buddhism or any primitive Christianity or Islam or not?

Absolutely not!

The crux is that place. If a Buddhist doctrine with the law and rules are rules available, then it will be the way that Buddhism self denial themselves. We (the Buddhist ones) should not seek a moral form of dogma to follow it blindly obey. We have to order a review to see what I'm doing, are wishing anything and are living how to ...

Morality can only arise from the bottom of every human being to help us integrate an absolute way with a correct reality, by a real expansion of her crush.

The words which the Buddha speaks of always keeping the vividly to this day me also because for us, protect us and cause us to be touched (the Buddha's recommendation in my heart cause I'm thrilled you like as the Buddha are his commandments, admonished his own heart out yesterday and in this moment, and the live action in the teachings of the Buddha. the lively is the basics of Buddhist ethics, and that's not necessarily a moral structure imposed, is absolute and real di room). If you look under certain angles will be nothing unreasonable rather than a deliberately set a theoretical basis to rely on which to build a foundation of Buddhist ethics.

All the ethical issues that the Western world usually brings out controversy--such as the issue of sexuality (homosexuality, how high-su, contraception, etc.), suicide, death by means of medicine to avoid painful (euthanasia), the attitude of behaving in social (social/comportement social behavior) the ...-does not carry the same meaning in the spirit of Buddhism (the Oriental society today it's also have been attracted by the physical values of the Western world and also hug always the moral issue does not escape and sometimes very unreasonable that knowledge). Motivating and caution in the consciousness of each individual human being to behave to each individual context occurs at a certain point, there will be much more important than just finding a real solution di translate. Buddhism not only emphasizes the relative attributes of phenomena (Bollywood impermanence and illusion of every phenomenon represents the relative truth) but also promote particular values where each human in every situation. For Buddhists, the moral is temporary and patchwork, always looking for ways to accommodate the long series of endless solicitations between action and consequences. Truth is, if sought to concretize the long string on it to turn it into a rigid container, then indeed there would only be one thing Juana.

The above is what shows Germany Ph t different from the founder of other religions. Moses (the founder of Judaism) to fix the law into a sheet of ice and his nation must accordingly that comply, if the offense will be in Heaven punish (Please note the author grew up in a family of Jews). The whole social collective are faithful to that Law.

Vision that Buddha opened it completely different. The Buddha was an example for us to follow in order to look back and improved yourself.

Buddhist ethics is always associated with meditation like?

Want the full spectacle of Buddhist ethics is necessarily aware of the ethical platform which are inseparable from the meditation, that means we have to behave like how to keep peace always in his heart.

For we (Western people) then the moral role regulating marginalized the behaviour which we must follow. But on the way to practice, don't tell us how to do that. For example, teach children and youth age must comply with some rules somewhere, but can't explain them to understand that compliance is necessarily derived from their inner primary (IE. we teach kids not to kill animals, but does not explain that they understand there is a way to help them know the respect and love of life, and there is also a file for them to launch the spirit of nonviolence).

We (Western people) wasn't aware of is that we know is interested in theoretical aspects of ethics in order to distinguish it from the practice, and for the most part practice then we only see that applying these principles has been set in advance by reason (i.e. theory).

The integral that is totally strange to Buddhism. Because in view of Buddhism, then any one of mind does not arise from the experience felt by human beings in this place and in this moment are necessarily only a single fourth direct (from falling out and lost all its practical value). The path of the Buddha said that we are always clouded by the trace from the trust claims and beliefs of his availability. Find out what's new voila-a lively thinking stuff! Of the application if he minds the most discerning enough not to help us deal with a troubling scene occurred, thinking she would just be a blind thinking stuff and disabled (break out the assertiveness and the new availability of belief can bring himself the lively thinking – that is freedom – but the liberal thinking that failure to integrate the experiences felt by us prior to implementation in order to help us to respond to every scene scenarios happen, the thinking now whether they are Liberals but also just the blind thinking and away from reality).

As for the Buddha, although one has to act in accordance with any moral, but if in your own resentment and fear then it is not a true moral action (though the outside is an act of morality but of resentment and fear in the hearts will bold traces on the line of his knowledge to create career not good for yourself). On the contrary, sometimes also need to act rudely, despite the usual moral standards can respond adequately to a scene or situation occurs (e.g. real protest vigorously to stop standing in a violent action to safeguard the fairness and humanitarian, or to cover for a sentient being in jeopardy, for example).

Then there are the differences between the Buddhist moral precepts and the justices ordered real di room of Western morality, such as what was the philosopher Kant raised and deeply embedded in the life in Western societies?

Buddhist ethics include the five precepts, and of these, the first three precepts carry greater significance than two precepts afterwards.

Five precepts he is as follows:

-Avoid killing any living creatures have sensory experience

-Avoid theft

-Avoid sexual socializing not cause detrimental

-Avoid do not lie, do not eat said three States helpless or say the words slander

-Avoid using hazardous substances

Buddhist ethics are not particularly intentional prohibition of any one thing and also are not required to keep a certain attitude would, but rather only advises us to avoid some of the attitude of certain conduct. The Buddhist moral precepts is not the justices ordered to bring the absolute character and are set based on reason, and in view of the Kant (a German philosopher .1724-1804, founder of the theory of "supernatural ideal"-transcendental idealism), the judge's order at the same time as the duty is pragmatic and global value. By contrast the Buddhist moral precepts is just the norm is set up based on my observation of human life. According to the Buddha, people need improved his consciousness similar to a sporting House must take. Our motivation in the determination that is wholeheartedly look forward to stars for themselves more and know like in a mirror than before every scene and every moment in a. The determination that can only come from our human place in the integrity of it – not just based on the way of thinking of morality, or moral reason is sufficient.

Most of the people follow the Buddhist path will voluntarily comply with the first three precepts, or all five precepts, or possibly even more. They pick a certain time in the day to review the Act must hold (such as at bedtime, in the morning when you wake up ... must spend a few minutes to recall the precepts that I determined to obey).

Avoid non mean?

Non means are not allowed to take the life of any creature whatsoever. Murderer of course are suppressed (can not accept the death penalty in a country imbued Buddhism) but the prohibitions which must also be respected for all living things from the species of mammals, birds, fish, and for every kind of insect. For Buddhists, the lives of all organisms containing sensory experience know the suffering must be respected. We are not allowed to cause pain to any creature.

As for the Buddha, kill means deliberately deprived the life of another sentient beings. The austerities to comply with some of the precepts given by Buddha himself, and more Lord also explains clearly how a police action was born:

-[First] there must be a creature (the existence of a true beings outside of the conscious mind)

-We get to know is there a creature (the appearance of an object in consciousness)

-We reveal intent to kill (Italian author appears in consciousness)

-We kill animals by using a certain method (volitional moved into action)

Of the Buddha analyzed the process above is to emphasis the role of pulse power inside the consciousness motivates us to act. That's the way remind us always to increase vigilance, and to understand that an insect is also a sensory biology feelings (être sentant, être sensible/sensitive/being a sentient beings know pain. A few books of this Chinese text translation from Vietnamese as "they love" (?), then there is a way to translate not proper) so we are deprived of it; and if the sense is that it will also have a way of cultivation. If you see a cow up close insects m nh (or clinging to his people) then there also should not be a reason for that, of course, kill it. Avoid not to kill it will help us to recognize the real way of the transparency that we have just launched is both an operating structure (in his mind) help themselves do not cause suffering, and furthermore also help himself not to impose its supremacy over any one thing.

Suicide is an extremely violent act because it is an action to destroy a reality (the life of a plant is also part of reality and the reality that has her own life). Meanwhile the Buddha's path back is how to know how to receive the correct implementations (i.e. in the integrity of it).

Why not be stealing?

The Buddha taught us not to take anything that other people don't give themselves.

Act to hear others say used to be a way that we're receiving a lot of stuff does not belong to itself, although not when we are conscious of that. That's the way we usually grab much Riding Hood falls into the field of emotional and viewed it as his own property, don't over well because we were motivated by the desire of emotional forms without deprivation or no

The path of the Buddha advised we should courageously face the emotional stuff to understand that they arise from a lack of confidence is justified (we need some emotional love such and we seek to embrace such things from the outside to compensate for their lack, and we lack firepower isn't over because we lost confidence in his place).

On the path of cultivation, the fullness (plénitude/fullness, fulfillment, abundance and full circle) is not dependent on what little we just want whatever to make your own. The result arises from the way reveal the confidence where our own dignity. Should obey his rules, it is a means to help reconstruct his dignity and to honor it. (Act relating to the action of theft not too hard to understand if a stolen object is a certain artifacts. Maybe that's why the author does not need to explain gab about the event which is merely a form of "stealing" or "whatever" more subtle way emotionally or psychologically, i.e. a the appropriation of emotion or sentiment that I feel "deprivation". The seizure or holding of that commie is in the form of volitional, and that's what will save the marks deepened his knowledge on the line. In other words, it is how to create "career" survives on continuous flow of knowledge to force yourself into samsara. So not only have to avoid not to reveal the work of greedy Italian made himself staring at an object thereof, but also be wary before the "whatever" as forms of emotion or sentiment that is the subject of psychological forms manifest in his mind. It is the way the chemical purity of her heart and mind to help yourself more confident where our own dignity. Thanks to it the consciousness and the heart will also become richer is full and round, and the wealth that will make her feel ready devoted by both hands what you have in your heart when seeing other people shortage. Furthermore the circle filled in my heart will also help yourself noticed is no longer something outside grounds to yourself whatever again though it is a physical or emotional stuff would too).

Avoid committing the sexual tourism cause detrimental means and why must follow his precepts?

As the schools that the problem of poor sexual morals is understood differently, but usually it means a sexual behavior causes suffering. Out a way of covering more then poor sexual morals mean a sexual behaviour do not respect other people, not to create a real connection with someone he didn't know the consequences. It is an act of prejudice to the existence of the Buddha in his heart, and not be put to the attention to themselves.

Why must always keep the ethical conduct?

Some schools implemented many subtle inference methods to encourage people to enforce an ethical conduct, attitude and if based on how the General statements in Buddhist scriptures, you can call it is staying not caused suffering to others.

In a Buddhist society, the largest concern is the need to be aware that a detrimental action-such as kill, rape, stealing, lying, defamation-of course will bring negative consequences squeeze asphyxia and drowning us in misery. Hatred gives rise to hatred. Violent lead to violent.

At a deeper level, and it's awfully easy to understand is if know pick yourself up an attitude of moral conduct voila is also helping themselves back to yourself. Violation on the infamous action contrary just make yourself away from yourself, separated from her own life. The fruit is also strange, cruel words in French language (méchant, nasty, evil of .../vicious, evil cheats, sea etc.) carries a very significant is the Buddhism that literally means "falling into the mistake" (mal chu/falling into the wrong). Over expression in the language of the French people do not deliberately evil just because of "falling into the mistake". So cruel a manner of conduct outside the US and outside of both his own aspirations. If not practicing real meditation persist then the result most dangerous for us to keep the heart not entangled in envy, hatred and resentment. Meanwhile, what is most evident that we have to create for yourself the happiness.

Buddhist people look at how sexuality issues, there is a doubt for this problem is the same as for the religions based on the Bible or not?

Under the label of Buddhism the sexual problem is not a sin. Just be careful that it doesn't pass because it is easily brought to a State of fairly outlandish blindly (is motivated by the pulse of the industry and dominated by a TV talent can make it look like a page of delusion and passionately-like lightning-discerning enough not to consider or think anything else). Vigilance before the sexual desires and not turn it into a dynamic impulse stuff just to provoke her, is a way of practicing healthy, cheery and it's necessary.

Buddhism and homosexuality issues look like?

Anyone knowing homosexual problem old as the Earth, but never seen one page books does mention this issue. The deal between the two men had sexual same sex or not, nor is it a reason to blame that which the judge is their sexual behavior is correct or not. Emotions and the focus of the new standards is that they help to evaluate their behavior. The most essential thing is not to cause suffering to others.

On the history of Buddhism one finds several views are quite different.

In Japan, homosexuality was allowed even inside the monastery, also held the ceremonial form anymore. The monks often come from nobility or martial biền, and in this world, homosexuality is viewed as a form of culture, and particularly to be respected, not as the intercourse downgraded between men and women.

Most of the social conservatives, such as China, homosexuality is condemned because it is a very good character, not the offspring born to heir Zongtang-i.e. no descendants to worship her and handed down their line.

Homosexuality formerly suppressed is critical in the Tibetan society. some teachers today still continue to keep in view have been raised in many of the Tibetan books, said that "the sexual organs is to help in the work of reproduction between two components male and females; and the Buddhist point of view, all forms of deviance is not acceptable ". Indeed extremely surprised to see the innovative approach "chemical biology" as above was uttered from the mouths of the masters in the field of spirituality (most likely the views of teachers on here have influenced indirectly by one of the most primary notion of Tibetan Buddhism is a combination possible split between compassion and wisdom, and this combination is usually the logo by pictures combining masculine and feminine, so a number of teachers "conservatives" want to protect traditional "image" and did not want to give it chipped).

However there are also other Tibetan masters claim that homosexuality is no problem at all-what is mostly rather than honestly and respect each other in the society, it is landing new standards to evaluate a sexual behavior is plausible or not.

In short each person himself looks out the door of his house to see if there are true noon or not (this French proverb means that judgment a thing or an event which depends on her own perspective).

In the West, then back the other, we must question whether to embrace sexual orientation hate homosexuality (homophobie/homophobia) or not, a tendency always goes hand in hand with that of worship men (machisme/male chauvinism) real extremism of Asiatic peoples (did this question extremely passages if not very hard to fully evacuate: can the author wanted to say homosexuality is the postulate of absolute equality of the sexes – male, female and male news and women-in the meantime, the hate homosexuality is an indirect form of contrast, i.e. undertakings displaced Southern women's horizon, and it is a condition in which backward Western people are so self before embrace sexual orientation enemies hate homosexuality).

We (the Buddhist ones) would have the duty to amend the moral precepts of Buddhism and criticized the longstanding prejudice that as of today we are no longer acceptable? Are we not supposed to accept it, which we are nowadays no longer in line with the teachings of the Buddha, too, though for that to be confirmed by the prestigious leadership? (did this question again left passages than the above. First of all should acknowledge the creator as the Western people, written for Western people, in the context of Western society under heavy pressure by the tendency to hate homosexuals, and that is what the pressure arising from the Foundation of their longstanding. Most Western conservatives who feel he has the duty to oppose homosexuality as "vices" this goes against the basic principle of the traditions of their longstanding beliefs.

Meanwhile, the Buddhist who has a playful attitude, they have the responsibility to modify Buddhist ethics in order to adapt to today's context, nor do they have the duty to accept things as they are now no longer in line with the teachings of the BuddhaDespite that it was due to the "charismatic leadership" forced them to accept.

For Buddhism, homosexuality is a similar phenomenon like thousand of other phenomena in the universe. If looked at under an angle voila over limited edge is a social phenomenon similar to other social phenomena, and if the latest phenomenon in a field of narrowed even further then this is the career of an individual. Spoke to colleagues, they must understand that it is not a penalty, a fate nor logos for a sin at all.

People often misunderstand the machinery that the industry as a result of the negative way, similar to a penalty that an individual incurs. But the meaning of Karma from the "action" (karma), and its deepest meaning as well as the "actions". If you have an "actions" then it always contain the meaning of a certain freedom. Similarly, the homosexuality carried a certain freedom aspect, a "free" assume the consequences brought about from his actions and "freedom" created for himself by his own actions. In summary the Buddhist point of view, there is a law or a rule aimed at condemning homosexuality as a serious mistake, a sin that violators must been marginalised.

Homosexuality also appears in the Asiatic Society similar to that in the Western countries but with more or less discreetly and seems quite normal. By contrast in the West, homosexuality is a problem it's gritty, hundreds of thousands to millions of protesters annually throughout major cities to demand the right to life, human dignity, as well as their equality before the law and in society.

The Western society advocated absolute personal freedom, but of "moral" is influenced too heavily by the longstanding tradition of belief, always seeking to condemn some of the behavior is entirely up to individual areas (contraception, homosexuality, how high-su ...). It's a measure of ambivalence and paradox is unsolvable. Actually, the thing of the thing "is one's own, use it or not use it, then the freedom of each person. The role of ethics is to put yourself into a higher position to shape the direction and harmony in society, not to be winging things to that condemnation, because there is only one form of ethics direct.

For a Buddhist, you should look at the issue of sexuality in General – in any form and its deviations-as a way to "concretize" of TV-like instincts. If have is instinct voila is a means by which companies used to govern and human bondage. If looking at the twelve-bond bondage-also known as the cross charm erren-tie them into the realms of samsara, you will see that the first line represents the primitive ignorance, is cause for brought to the birth. So if want to convict should condemn the students, should not be convicted of a particular "culture" at all of TV-like instincts, even though they have been garbled more or less, because it is only the inevitable consequence of the students only).

Affordable has come the need to fight the atrocity of the cult, a police watch spirituality and the human body in which the religion only wants imposed on people, even sometimes by force.

Buddhism how conceptions of how to use the money?

Buddhism is very little mention of how to make money but instead just interested attitudes towards money.

Indeed, the denial of the will and choose for themselves a life of poverty (renunciation) is a method of deep truth help deal easier than before to a coin. That's the way of the austerities they qifu mumo carried each day to eat and there's a little bit of wealth would also valuable clues on KESA robes along the vase Bowl on hand.

On the contrary, for the secular Liberal family in search of a means of survival that gives her a most comfortable life, as long as you don't get to put her survival goes too far and must fall on disappointing (not to be too ambitious, the plan is too big, plan too far, beyond his ability to then have to head to fail). Buddhism does not see poverty is an ideal just like in Christianity.

Lust money also like other desires, if the view is a way to express your self then it will make themselves vulnerable to falling into the blind. Is a Buddhist who don't cling to money, don't get yourself a slave to money-but not so waive and denial of money, are not allowed to touch it.

The way he called the middle path forward. But what is the Middle? Indeed there is something quite strange to us (Western people), because we often have the habit of thinking based on the principle of duality (duality here means a the contrast or the opposite: taking money or is not money. Middle Road between these two extreme there). Middle means not desire money, nor is it doesn't want the money (it's under the "comment" section foursome of Nagarjuna: "don't-wanna-be" also "no-not-to-be", there are two sides of the four sides of the logic called quarter-the commentary). Bottom line is that we are launching is a correlation it's generous for the money.

In other words, if view finding money is the purpose of human existence then it would be an attitude extremely superficial and unjustified, and that not with the opposite attitude that is to deny the money. In conclusion all the more important thing is motivation from inside his own mind.

We might just want to earn some money, but always let the obsession, or conversely acting out so much money but know spending money to bring a more comfortable life, and at the same time not not cling on to a coin which perhaps we also know to use it to turn himself into a human pride launch anymore.

How to can know that their actions are right or not while the quick response before an event is happening?

That's thanks to analyzing traces saved from his actions.

Step by step of the Buddha means to analyze each scene scenarios occur more and more accurate than most sought to behave with them in a way adapted for. There is a certain rule would be set so that we can rely on that conduct. Books that mention the case compelled to murder action-this is the case of killing a burglar coming out hand to kill a group of traders to Rob. (this is a story about a Dude-slapped the Buddha to kill bandits to rescue the crew on the vessel).

The above behavior is different when compared the views of philosopher Kant. For this philosopher then banned lie such must be respected absolutely, not allowed any offense in any case. If that would have difficulty to know that he is right or not, just need to know the legal compliance is sufficient.

Buddhism open up an entirely different vision. Is a review of his actions and even motivating her act again (action arises from an idea in the mind, and the mind arises from a marks of reserves remain saved on the line followed the continuity of knowledge. Of marks into Italian works is because the knowledge of interpreting what the Pentagon feel when exposed to the exterior, and expression which has "woken up" and "provoke" marks to turn it into the work of the next Italian Italian author to reveal to the outside by action or words. In summary the response it-i.e. acting to reveal on the body or verbal-always reflect energy pulses inmost remain stored on the knowledge. A person must practice consistently finds and tracks are the most help yourself proactively are his actions and words, not allowing the hazardous volitional control themselves. The practice should not only look at the Act i.e. the consequences that have to look at the causes of deep energy pulses i.e. sealed in his mind).

You may be wondering is her actions because of the happiness of sentient beings, or just to make the attempt and her personal ambition? In other words, the motivation of your action is that your heart Awakening (bodhicitta)-(bodhi mind)-, or it is just way to demonstrate to uphold myself (narcissique/narcissistic) or because of a fear that does that?

If you look under this aspect, the Buddhist ethics will close with a form of moral (sagesse, wisdom, ingenuity or wise) than a moral form.
Regret and guilt
keep a role in Buddhism or not?

There is no reason to have to carry heavy feelings of guilt. There's the guilt has no benefit but also the risk of us lock themselves into yourself. It is not a sentiment the Buddhist way, because for the Buddhist concept of guilt the tribe complete strangers, and furthermore always Buddhism emphasizes the fact that from the inside of all humans have hidden all the friendly Museum, and just make it appear.

By contrast regret can be beneficial. If Miss a precepts that previously he had the will to comply with, and if I don't feel energetic enough to enforce his pledge that Convention, it is important above all is aware of her status. Shouldn't the Orange hand bouquet that should not be ignored hand look events. Both attitudes are proving themselves irresponsible, not worthy of an adult human.

Regrets that inaction (to do one job should not do) will make your heart collided, it is also a way to help yourself spotted more transparent way that I made on the mistake and I will know to preserve morality more carefully.

When would the feeling of regret will no longer torment themselves anymore then should also use that momentum to launching real determination to firmly follow the path of the Buddha.

Why Buddhist ethics are promoted based on meditation?

Buddhist ethics always require every moment in life is to be the perfect moments. The Zen master Shunryu Suzuki's Zen has stated as follows: "for kitchens or cooking is not just recipes but also a practice anymore. When do the kitchen then you must manifest himself through the movements of the kitchens. Cooking is not only meant for processing food for someone or for you; It is an occasion to demonstrate the sincerity (sincérité, sincerity, simplicity, simplicity and genuineness) of yourself. When cooking, you have to reveal the existence of movements associated with the kitchen nực. You have to put all your attention on doing a kitchen, you can cook but always conscious mind in a can as serene and not expecting anything. You just know you're cooking it! That's how do manifest can form true and simple and it is also a way of contributing to the cultivation of yourself ".

We'll be direct when that cultivate is a way to create a link with a possible absolute form, with an ultimate truth, with God or with the enlightenment. That's the way that we think that the way that we cultivate is stepping in to take us to a place no longer the illusion of this world. But actually, it doesn't have to be the way of the Buddha. [walk on the way's then] there somewhere else (to which expectation), also there is nothing called ideal (to which targeted).

Buddhist practice is directly concerned with the reality with all its simplicity. That is not the way to help me find a way out. Every gesture and action are all contributing to the practice, such as taking off words to greet someone when you meet, to reveal a certain attitude, dress, eat rice...-all is ethics (must always aware and wary of every little gesture itself).

Not allowed to relax the conscious mind so that it spoiled for vacationing.

No-action means nothing and why it represents the most profound meaning of the Buddhist ethics?

For Buddhists, living a moral life means always consistent see the good and proper in each case scenes occur in order to help ourselves to behave in a natural way and fits that trend.

Buddhist ethics is formed from the experience felt in daily life of people. We went off the road and are thinking of meeting that I attended, a person who is temporarily away in front of distress (suffering from robbery, assault or stumble...). So we have to react like? A virtuous actions not necessarily only be ph t based on theoretical considerations or which is normally due to the ability to respond quickly before an event is happening.

It is a natural response to a specific incident scene, and after that it must be further promoted by intelligence intuition (prajna) (wisdom). Buddhism calls an action does not arise from any one consideration would be "non-action".

Non-action is not meant to "do nothing" that actually is going to do-but not so that the action "do" doesn't reveal is the determination of a distinct subject aims to highlight the subject's up (IE. we're alms but didn't recognize their almsWhat are alms, alms and to whom, so called non-I-lab, but what exactly was I-lab, because behind the Act of alms still hides the Museum a the determination of a subject with an enlarged heart and hands to heads).

No event-action party in action (such as alms without knowing that he was the alms) seems like a paradox, but can also be understood as an individual action and the action of the individual's personality to rise above duality (with no subject and object). But he individual action, but don't let the notion of self in his head to find a slot available that can be set are external developments (related to the individual's actions). The experience felt was extremely simple and anyone can do it. For example, while a fitness competition (right into the action, such as the high jump, kick or kick a ball), competition (on the subject exam), cooking (see the pot of boiling water has not yet, it's time to give the vegetables in the pot yet...)-in what was then the notion of the self can be deleted for his dimmed immersing into the what you are doing.

Buddhist art in General and in particular for the Japanese art often evokes is distinctly non-personality-action there. The brushes of a calligraphy written on the paper looks like the will of itself, artists who never thought of himself as the driver of the moving home to top of the pen. A musician are Fiddler cello but get the feeling that I'm not playing music that the music itself is réo rắt. The musicians fully integrate with what we are doing, to the point where is no longer aware of the movement of the fingers, is also unaware that his instruments are used including the fact that I'm playing music. The observer-news self-serve regular cylinders and judge what we're enforcing (interpreting the phenomena are occurring) temporarily disappear. We fully integrate into the actions that we are taking. But not so for that we fall into the m t status "unconsciously", by contrast him because now the meantime our presence in reality become more firmly than ever at all (we integrate into what is happening and where the fall also will disappearWe become reality and reality is one, there is no man at all, no self at all).

Why on the history of Buddhism

the masters despite to the ethics,

Sometimes there seems despised other people anymore?

It has to be an eyesore or not?

It's that, in countries such as China, Korea, Tibet, etc., the fruit is no longer see some teachers genuinely freak, despite ethics and would love to find ways to tease those who tend to think right and one way. Real attitude in compliance with (the Convention and the margins the way formula) are sometimes seen as a practice for some Buddhist schools-this is also a way to reveal the power and shook the Buddha's preaching of the word.

Strictly no teachers would mock ethics at all. Don't cross is because some of them have found morally very vulnerable to variations in order to become a Marxist stereotyping (conformism) sometimes can be seen as a minor hypocrisy in society anymore.

That's just how the behavior that the masters used to adapt the scene event occurs (with the respond to incident scenes by provocation and violent). It is also a way of reminding us that enlightenment is sometimes detected through an earthquake (choquant/shocking) that does that. Morality is also a great workout for us cats and reduce the burden of feelings always narrow-minded themselves is central, and most are aware of is not just ethical compliance is enough but also to rescue people out of what such trivial and the fear in their hearts (fear of committing mistakes or non-compliance are the precepts, etc.). An attitude of conduct appropriate to a scene or situation occurs don't necessarily have to recognize from a point of view outside of that attitude (that is very difficult for us to evaluate an action or a way to behave when he stood in third place).

People often say to this phenomenon and see it as a "folly-filled wisdom" ("une folle sagesse"/"a mad wisdom"), a wisdom becomes crazy when required to conduct genuinely adapted to morality, a wisdom dare accept your insanity to be able to express its point of view is a more private way. But there is a way to express the most sincere love love, a form of ethics (a Zen master Lam doesn't hesitate when eye and cut one's finger phăng Sami when people imitate he put one finger up and not answer every time anyone asks anything. The teachers are not angry that the name Sami dare to imitate him that he only wounded him cling and imitate a stupid way what others do. The name Sami too afraid to hold hands full of blood and running. The teachers have yet to be released but also holding the knife in pursuit. The name Sami back to see his master eye and putting a finger up, while his fingers then were cut loose, he's suddenly awaken and sudden attainment of enlightenment. Just saying please remind people that love in my heart enough to reveal a power similar to the Zen master Lam are also not to be imitated by way of his teaching time).

Meditation, ethics and understanding intuition

For the majority of the people who practice Buddhism, the Buddha's teachings can be summarized in three main points are as follows: Ethics (shila), meditation (samadhi) and the intuitive understanding (prajna) (wisdom). There are three power contribute to freeing our conscious mind. The way of the Buddha is the combination of three allowed to rehearse her (tu tu tu, gender and intellectual property).

Ethics is the most beautiful shirt that people can put up his people. The shirt that arise from their hearts to shine and the irradiation inside her, and then radiate out in the wide world. It helps us protect was able to format the integrity and worthy of her best. The shirt will impact the actions, gestures and words of ours.

Meditation keeps us on this ground and opens for us a dynamic atmosphere. It's also like a horse, so we rode much of the help that we can return to the consciousness of themselves and avoid yourself do not become victims of anxiety and distrust.

Understanding intuition helps us to consistently get a transparent way all the correct things like that. Learning the correct definition is not just a way of gathering knowledge or is to become a scientist, but what also helps us understand why and how we're not really yourself.

People often borrow the picture one of my balls and pitchers Moon reflected in comments to symbolize the significance and correlation between the three sources above capacity (morality, meditation and wisdom).

Ethics is the jar, symbolizes the attitudes of our conduct and it is also what contributed to protect his own people.

Meditation can for as water in the jar. We have to work out how to keep the water is quiet to its important part a mirror in the morning.

Understanding symbolic intuition by dashing silhouette of the Moon reflected in the water.

If the dirty tank and swaying, the surface will stall and not reflective of intellectual grasp.

If shadow Moon stance then how water in the jar and the jar can receive full-rounded beauty of celestial bodies in the universe.END=VIETNAMESE TRANSLATE ENGLISH BY=THICH CHAN TANH.THE MIND OF ENLIGHTMENT.WORLD VIETNAMESE BUDDHIST ORDER=VIETNSAMESE BUDDHIST NUN=GOLDEN LOTUS MONASTERY=THE EIGHTFOLD PATH.NAM MO SAKYA MUNI BUDDHA.( 3 TIMES ).AUSTRALIA,SYDNEY.18/7/2014.